Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyrie/ Shumpert for Kemba/ MKG ?


TheWiz

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

Please. Stfu. Same $hit people said about KD. He cant share the ball. 

 

At the end of the day, GSW needed KD to take over. Thats why they are two time champs. 

You can make the argument that Kyrie is a better PG than Curry, but Curry is a much better fit for the style of offense the Warriors play. Ask @Montsta who he'd rather have running the point for the Warriors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

I dont think Kyrie would leave in two years. Hes from Duke. He can be the man here and other guys would love to come play with him. Hes still in his prime. And when he see the max deal, why would he leave? 

John Wall stayed in Washington. They didnt have anything to offer him but the contract and Wall stayed bc of that. 

And dont even begin the why would anyone want to play with Kyrie now if he doesnt want to play with LBJ talk. I think more players are annoyed by LBJ more than you think. Its tough to play with a guy that want to win that much. Also, LBJ cries too damn much. 

yea my evidence for him wanting to leave is that apparently he named the Knicks, Spurs, T Wolves, and Heat as teams he would want to be traded to, but you're right no guarantees 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

gsw would be the freakin Dream Team with Irving. Curry is no much better a passer than Irving. Or a better defender. Curry is nothing but a 3 point artist. Irving makes Curry is bit(h every time.

GS is better with Curry at PG than Kyrie. That's my point. 1v1? I don't think either of them could stop the other. Both are below-average defenders and both have top 5 handles in the league. I think they'd score on each other almost every time. If you ask me who I'd rather have on my team it'd depend on the surrounding cast and style of basketball the team plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pantherphan96 said:

You can make the argument that Kyrie is a better PG than Curry, but Curry is a much better fit for the style of offense the Warriors play. Ask @Montsta who he'd rather have running the point for the Warriors.

Kyrie a much better pure PG than Curry. Hell, Chris Paul twice the pure PG Curry is. But I wouldn't want either of them playing the point in Curry's place on the Dubs. Curry's range opens up the floor for our shooters wayyyy more than a true floor general could. You literally gotta start guarding Steph from 40' out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Montsta said:

Kyrie a much better pure PG than Curry. Hell, Chris Paul twice the pure PG Curry is. But I wouldn't want either of them playing the point in Curry's place on the Dubs. Curry's range opens up the floor for our shooters wayyyy more than a true floor general could. You literally gotta start guarding Steph from 40' out. 

Exactly my point. Though I'd argue Kyrie isn't that much better of a pure PG than Curry considering he avgs 5.6 APG. Paul probably the best pure PG in the game now, though a few years ago it was definitely Rondo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, carolina-chuck3 said:

Hell no to trading Monk!!!!!!

Yeah thats insane even before the multiple first rounders garbage.

The hornets need to just stay away from Kyrie all togther.  Kembas a great player and cheaper and a better teammate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope not. 3rd-5th round QB's are historically awful. Most of the time that team is just drafting another QB in the first the following year. Look at the Saints, if they continue to suck this year they are just taking a QB. And if they do they just threw away a 2nd round pick that they just drafted. We did the same poo with Clausen, Greer, Pike, that guy we drafted a few years ago who is so irrelevant I forgot his name...  Just take a 1st round QB if Bryce isn't the answer and be prepared to live with it
    • This reminds me on Madden where you create an alternate uniform and the pre-recorded voice overs talk about how hideous your uniform looks. 🤣
    • There are people on this forum that just want to see a lot of passing yards....number go up. That's all it is, really. They are thirsting for a 350-400 yard game. The idea that Jameis Winston is going to come in and play like a star and lead us to wins is ludacris. He's the 3rd fuging string for a 2-5 team and has played horrible for years now. Sure, passing numbers will go up but you'll also get a lot of dumb plays, pick 6's, and incompletions en route to a frustrating bad offensive performance, just in a different way. I think these people are yearning for another Delhomme situation, and the odds of that happening are very very slim. It's way more likely Howell or Jameis comes in and looks like Jack Plummer or Andy Dalton did in the preseason. There just isn't that much good quarterbacking in this league right now. And if we draft another QB in the first round, there is a good chance they bust. It's not a guaranteed carrot. The reality is, as mediocre as Bryce has been, the risk of bringing someone else in in-season and releasing Bryce becuase you aren't happy with his current performance is staggeringly high. Don't want to re-up his contract and search for a solution in the offseason? Sure, I'm on board. Bryce hasn't been good enough to warrant a second contract. But It is very. very unlikely that bringing someone else in midseason is going to give this team more wins.
×
×
  • Create New...