Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Winners/Losers - preseason game 4


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

WINNERS 

- Kaelin Clay : Could he possibly beat out Damiere Byrd? He's just as fast and is a bigger playmaker. 

- Ben Jacobs : very solid performance with 6 tackles. 

- Dezmen Southward : 7 tackles performance and the fact that he can play free safety gives him a spot on our 53.

LOSERS

- Zack Sanchez : just when he was about to make the team (maybe) he suffers a groin injury.

- Joe Webb : was outplayed by Garrett Gilbert and threw 2 picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

On a positive note, David Mayo looks like he can more than adequately take over the spot for AJ Klein. May actually be better

Another COMP pick thanks to GMan thinking long term and being responsible in the early months of 2014, and for taking a kid out of nowhere that wasn't even on the ESPN or NFL Network draft radar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...