Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucky Brooks on O-lines, coaching and things.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Like so many run-of-the-mill NFL players, Bucky Brooks became a football analyst and sports journalist, but with jobs as a professional scout in between. I think that it's his experience as a scout that gives his articles such interesting and insightful perspectives (at least in my mind). 

In his latest article, he discusses the importance of the offensive line, and tackles and left tackles in particular. He reasserts what we all believe: if you're lucky enough to have your franchise QB, protecting him should be your priority. Brooks also goes into the different ways that you can build that O-line and provides legitimate examples. Moreover, he discusses the huge difference that good coaching can make in the success and/or failure of different signal callers, using some of the first weekend's games as prime examples as in the case of Andy Reid with Alex Smith, and of course Sean McVay with Jared Goff.

Good team building, coaching and teaching makes a difference, and with everything that Brooks pointed out, I couldn't help but think of all of these things in relation to our Carolina Panthers. Some may not think so, but I believe that the Panthers have a staff of teachers, like Rivera envisioned when he first came here, so I feel pretty great about that aspect in relation to Brooks' thoughts. I am a little more critical as pertaining to the team building aspect because Dave Gettleman and Marty Hurney were never perfect in my eyes, but relatively recent personnel moves are giving me varying degrees of optimism (however guarded) for the immediate future at the very least. We will see.

Brooks didn't mention the Panthers in reference to the above, but he did mention the Panthers. For all the talk of offensive evolution during the offseason, it was the defense that caught Brooks' eye during the start of our regular season.

The entire article is a must read for football types interested in team building and coaching philosophy and the like, and how it can have a profound impact upon success, but I'll leave what Brooks said about the defense here:

 

» Carolina's new approach on defense: The Carolina Panthers have ranked as a top-10 defense in four of the past five seasons, but new defensive coordinator Steve Wilks is attempting to uphold the tradition utilizing a different approach. Instead of sitting back in traditional zone coverage with a few select pressures, the Panthers are attacking opponents with blitzes from all over the place. Against the 49ers, Carolina blitzed on 21 snaps (most in the NFL) leading to the third-highest pressure rate in the league on quarterbacks inside the pocket. While the increased blitz calls shouldn't rank as a surprise given the team's lack of an elite edge rusher (Julius Peppers is one of the best pass rushers in the NFL history, but he is past his prime at 37), the decision by Wilks to use more zone-blitz pressures is a bit of a departure from the team's conservative zone approach in previous seasons.

Interestingly, the Panthers utilized their 3-3-5 personnel package on 19 snaps, yielding just 2.5 yards per play. The "Okie" package puts three defensive linemen, three linebackers and five defensive backs on the field to harass the quarterback with myriad pre-snap disguises and blitzes that confuse pass protectors at the line of scrimmage. With this combination of pressure and disguise also leading to more one-on-one matchups, the Panthers' blitz-happy approach could produce big results going forward.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000845643/article/does-nfl-have-offensive-line-problem-plus-jared-goffs-growth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...