Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here's a few questions our weak reporters should ask Ron and Cam


beastson

Recommended Posts

Cam talking about 2 turnovers. Ron talk about 2 turnovers and the deep ball that lead to 3 for Chicago. He said the game came down to those 3 plays, no it didn't

2 turnovers is not the end of the world

The questions are simple, why does this team struggle overcoming losing the turnover battle? Why when this team gets down big, they rarely win? Why was this team lifeless only being down 2 scores? Off-topic question, but related to this team problem. If this team was down 28-9 entering the 4th quarter in the SB, do you honestly think you can win? Is this a Superbowl caliber team right now? Why isn't your defense forcing turnovers? 1 interception all year, is that acceptable? What needs to change to make sure our players are in position to get interceptions like other defenses are against us? Why this team had more time to prepare for Chicago and looked worse than when they had less time to prepare for Philly? Please give us an idea of how this team prepare, do you look at weak spots on opposing teams? Do you look for mismatches and how to exploit them? Do you believe what happens on the field comes to down to execution only?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You won’t hear any worthwhile questions bc the reporters don’t really care about this team. They’re probably all just a bunch of Saints and cowboy fans trying to earn a pay check. No one wants to be that one reporter who stirs the pot and points the finger at coaches. Ask the generics, keep coaches happy with you, earn your pay, and go home. 

 

If fans or anyone who gave a rats ass about this team asked the questions, you best believe Ron would have some major questions to answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, beastson said:

Cam talking about 2 turnovers. Ron talk about 2 turnovers and the deep ball that lead to 3 for Chicago. He said the game came down to those 3 plays, no it didn't

2 turnovers is not the end of the world

The questions are simple, why does this team struggle overcoming losing the turnover battle? Why when this team gets down big, they rarely win? Why was this team lifeless only being down 2 scores? Off-topic question, but related to this team problem. If this team was down 28-9 entering the 4th quarter in the SB, do you honestly think you can win? Is this a Superbowl caliber team right now? Why isn't your defense forcing turnovers? 1 interception all year, is that acceptable? What needs to change to make sure our players are in position to get interceptions like other defenses are against us? Why this team had more time to prepare for Chicago and looked worse than when they had less time to prepare for Philly? Please give us an idea of how this team prepare, do you look at weak spots on opposing teams? Do you look for mismatches and how to exploit them? Do you believe what happens on the field comes to down to execution only?

It is really so much simpler than that

why has this team never learned how to handle a blitz..doesn't matter if it's a corner blitz or up the middle they simply can't do it

of course asking hard questions gets reporters fired 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yea when teams see a gun charge they rightly pause but this seems like a big misunderstanding. 
    • Sorry man you lost me at "Teppers have evolved as owners". Limped into playoffs at 8-9 not even above .500 Tepper is trash as an owner bro and that's not even a discussion at this point. 37-83 w/l ratio. Nuff said.... Morgan tho, he's cooking and it ain't cuz of Teppers leadership
    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
×
×
  • Create New...