Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was a fair catch called?


Zod

Recommended Posts

If I'm not mistaken we have done this type of thing before. I can't exactly remember the game or whether it was this season or in the preseason, but I think Munnerlyn done it to some extent and we got away with it, so I wasn't really surprised about todays call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats only a digest of the rules, and not the full rulebook. And it doesn't mention what the ref described about two players going at each other. Both players were blocking and the receiving team blocker got pushed back into the receiver. Had the receiving team player been standing still and gotten pushed into the receive, it likely would have been a penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what referee Walt Coleman said of the play: “What happened was the two guys were blocking each other. The Washington guy got blocked into his own man so there was no interference. All we had to do was figure out who touched it first. If the Washington player is stationary and standing there and not trying to block, then he can’t do that. If they are both trying to block then he can knock him into him. Because they were both engaged then that’s why there wasn’t a foul or anything wrong with the play. If the Washington player is stationary and just standing there and the Carolina player had come down there and had knocked him, then it would have been totally different.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, so from now on Brayton and Pepp are gunners on the same side. Their job is to grab the defender and toss his ass violently into the punt returner. Love it.

Why are you trying to make it wrong? It was clearly posted that it's only legal if both guys are engaging each other..... In your statement it would only be Peppers and Brayton doing the engaging, which is illegal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What I love and hate about this team is it’s more filled with potential breakout players than ever before. JT, XL, Coker, Smith-Wade, Ikem, Trevin… and even Bryce are all guys I could legitimately see taking the next step. But the problem with having so many of those guys is that team success somewhat relies on them taking that step, and some are bound not to. That being said, I’m cautiously optimistic given our softer schedule, the way the offense clicked late last year, and the direction we finally have at GM, coach, and QB. Could see us as a sneaky playoff team.
    • Me, signing up for FanDuel Network, and then canceling FanDuel Network:
    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
×
×
  • Create New...