Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We’re going 10-6


RumHam

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, cptx said:

Seattle is handling Philly right now so you better hope for better than 10-6

Good point. The game isn’t over yet, but the Seahawks are having one of the more remarkable performances of the 2017 season. They are shutting down one of the most potent offenses in the league by limiting them to only a FG thu 3 quarters, without their Pro Bowl SS and CB.

Their offensive line is at best average but their handling arguably the best defensive front in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's easier since the lions lost and Stafford got hurt. But before today there was a scenario that if us, rams, saints, falcons, Seahawks and lions would all be 11-5 we wouldn't make it.

We still have the potential issue that all of our losses are in the NFC and that doesn't  bode well in tiebreaker scenarios   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minnesota will eat our lunch:  8-5

We will beat Green Bay regardless if Rodgers plays or not:  9-5

we will beat Tampa:  10-5

week 17 in Atlanta for the final spot  

 

I think the West gets two in:  hawks and rams

 

i think the south gets two in:  saints and winner of the week 17 play in game between Atlanta and Carolina. 

I will say this, if we were to lose to Green Bay after a Minnesota loss next week, you can put a fork in this season  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last week I said one of the 3 NFCS teams will go 10-6 and miss the playoffs. Saints have left that list. Division is theirs to lose. They will beat the falcons, so take the saints off that list

Almost certain Seahawks will grab that other WC spot. Their only tough game coming up is the Rams (they can beat them) and they are whooping the eagles as I write this. There is one spot left, and it is between us and the failcons. Whoever wants it more takes it... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LA_Panther said:

Last week I said one of the 3 NFCS teams will go 10-6 and miss the playoffs. Saints have left that list. Division is theirs to lose. They will beat the falcons, so take the saints off that list

Almost certain Seahawks will grab that other WC spot. Their only tough game coming up is the Rams (they can beat them) and they are whooping the eagles as I write this. There is one spot left, and it is between us and the failcons. Whoever wants it more takes it... 

And the Seahawks have already beat the rams once. 

This is why that Chicago game was so disappointing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are down now, but the reality is we just don't match up well with New Orleans.  We match up better with the Vikings.  Similar offensive and defensive numbers.  I think we beat Minnesota in in a close one,  then Tampa and Green Bay.  The Falcons split with New Orleans, which means that we would have the wild card locked up when we play them.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is one of my key concerns lost in the sauce that is the neverending conversation about him evading pressure and the OL. Eventually any QB is going to have to step up into the pocket and show the defense they can still beat them even if they get through. We have a limited QB who cannot consistently do this and as such we are relegated to going back and forth about how successful he was at evading pressure but we have little else to write home about. Tyler Shough stepped up into the pocket and made plays despite being pressured and sacked. He's played in about 35 less games than Bryce Young. That is a problem. And isn't just going to go away. The Bucs are going to do the same thing after watching the film.
    • Oh, absolutely! That doesn't absolve the absolute dogshit hockey that the team played in front of him, though. Only Cane that played well tonight was Bradly Nadeau.
    • Thanks for illustrating my point.  No one in the last several pages of this discussion is suggesting we should hang on to him, but anytime someone says anything less than "take him out back and shoot him" you act like they are. That's either you not understanding what you're reading or just being a nimrod because you can't keep up. (I would have said 'or just sh-tposting' but you're way too emotional on this topic for that) Either way, the result is the same 😆
×
×
  • Create New...