Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The reason Fox hates stats


CRA

Recommended Posts

b/c they at times point out the obvious....

Jake Delhomme has committed 10 turnovers through week 5 of the NFL season (4 games).

That is more turnovers than 26 teams have committed this season so far.(with teams playing an additional game)

The offense is killing this team. There poor performance yesterday was holding the team back again. Now that isn't all on Delhomme but I put it on him and Davidson/Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox is interested in stats. The only one he cares about is points for and points against. That is the only ones that translates into wins and losses. Everything else is instructive, informative, but won't decide if he keeps his job or not.

if that stat about Jake and the offense continues.....it will decide the fate of his job with relative ease. imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b/c they at times point out the obvious....

Jake Delhomme has committed 10 turnovers through week 5 of the NFL season (4 games).

That is more turnovers than 26 teams have committed this season so far.(with teams playing an additional game)

The offense is killing this team. There poor performance yesterday was holding the team back again. Now that isn't all on Delhomme but I put it on him and Davidson/Fox.

You can't pin DeAngelo's fumbles on fox or davidson or delhomme.

The team lacks drive and is just now getting it back somewhat.. only the next game will tell if it's really back. The problem with the offense is.. they can move the ball.. they just stall before getting into scoring position. Our Oline, over the course of one offseason has forgotton how to bulldoze people over. The right side of the oline with Otah and Vincent that was once so powerful that it overwhelmed several teams is now looking very average. Personally i think Vincent hasn't healed up his groin completely and doesn't have the drive in his legs all back. Otah was fired up as a rookie, but young players tend to lose focus when not everything is going their way.

Oline needs to get pumped up and blast Tampa Bay next week. Part of the reason why Gross was so effective in pass blocking last season was because our play action fakes were actually working since the defense could respect the run.

Losing hurts, it leads to explosive players trying to do too much on their own to try to win a game. Examples are Delhomme(who isn't explosive but a lot rides on his arm), Steve Smith, DeAngelo and Beason.

Out of those, Smith, Delhomme and Beason have slowed the game down, trying to take it one play at a time for the most part. But DeAngelo has to not try to DeShaun Foster it and run backwards and fumble. If we lose the turnovers, we could have won this game 7-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't pin DeAngelo's fumbles on fox or davidson or delhomme.

The team lacks drive and is just now getting it back somewhat.. only the next game will tell if it's really back. The problem with the offense is.. they can move the ball.. they just stall before getting into scoring position. Our Oline, over the course of one offseason has forgotton how to bulldoze people over. The right side of the oline with Otah and Vincent that was once so powerful that it overwhelmed several teams is now looking very average. Personally i think Vincent hasn't healed up his groin completely and doesn't have the drive in his legs all back. Otah was fired up as a rookie, but young players tend to lose focus when not everything is going their way.

Oline needs to get pumped up and blast Tampa Bay next week. Part of the reason why Gross was so effective in pass blocking last season was because our play action fakes were actually working since the defense could respect the run.

Losing hurts, it leads to explosive players trying to do too much on their own to try to win a game. Examples are Delhomme(who isn't explosive but a lot rides on his arm), Steve Smith, DeAngelo and Beason.

Out of those, Smith, Delhomme and Beason have slowed the game down, trying to take it one play at a time for the most part. But DeAngelo has to not try to DeShaun Foster it and run backwards and fumble. If we lose the turnovers, we could have won this game 7-3.

I didn't use Williams' turnovers or anyone elses on Carolina in the post. The point is Jake Delhomme (a single indivdual) has committed more turnovers than 26 NFL teams (that is everyone added together on those squads). Horrific playcalling has not helped Jake.....but those numbers are too much not to really acknowledge how pathetic this Davidson/Fox/Dehlomme led offense is. It isn't so much that they aren't that efficient or effective.....but the fact they have sabatoged the start of the season to a large degree by turning it over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if that stat about Jake and the offense continues.....it will decide the fate of his job with relative ease. imo.

If we win 10 games this year we could have the worse offense in the league and Fox will be here. The guy on the hotseat at that point would be Davidson not Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't use Williams' turnovers or anyone elses on Carolina in the post. The point is Jake Delhomme (a single indivdual) has committed more turnovers than 26 NFL teams (that is everyone added together on those squads). Horrific playcalling has not helped Jake.....but those numbers are too much not to really acknowledge how pathetic this Davidson/Fox/Dehlomme led offense is. It isn't so much that they aren't that efficient or effective.....but the fact they have sabatoged the start of the season to a large degree by turning it over.

The offense is bad right now across the board. Haters point to one player or the other without recognizing that more than one person is involved on a play and there are usually several contributing factors causing the problem. In the end Richardson is a football player as well as an owner and knows what is going on. If he thinks things are out of control he will pull the trigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Statistically, all that really matter outside of fantasy football is the only one that doesn't matter in fantasy football, wins/losses.

Right now, we're heavier in the losses, but there's some hope.

We can get all caught up in who has what yardage total, or who has how many picks, or who has the most sacks, but really it doesn't matter, does it?

We can all sit around and find any whiny stat we want to to justify firing the coach, or keeping the coach, or benching a QB or knighting a defensive end. But really, do any of them really matter?

-Time of possession? Not if you are the Colts.

-Pass Completion percentage? The Browns won yesterday with Anderson posting 2-17.

-Third down conversions? Not as big of a deal if you consistently convert on 1st or 2nd downs.

-Yards per Carry? Only takes 3.4 yards each time you touch it to move the chains.

-Sacks? Second most overrated stat in the game, right behind tackles.

Of course, that being said, those are all the reasons that make it fun to watch football. You want sacks, precision passing, thunderous rushing attempts, turnovers and whatnot. Without it, it would be just three yards and a cloud of dust all day long. Just slightly more interesting than baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win 10 games this year we could have the worse offense in the league and Fox will be here. The guy on the hotseat at that point would be Davidson not Fox.

No way to win 10 games if your QB single handedly is turning the ball over more than 84% of the entire teams in the league. There is no way for that stat to remain the same and for 10 wins to be posted.....some stats do matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way to win 10 games if your QB single handedly is turning the ball over more than 84% of the entire teams in the league. There is no way for that stat to remain the same and for 10 wins to be posted.....some stats do matter.

First of all that stat has changed given than 5 of the 10 were in the first game. Secondly if you create twice as many turnovers as you commit you will be in every game. And you are right, the stats that matter are wins and losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all that stat has changed given than 5 of the 10 were in the first game. Secondly if you create twice as many turnovers as you commit you will be in every game. And you are right, the stats that matter are wins and losses.

Jake's number is too alarming not to single him out.

Wins may be the all important stat....but if you don't address the problems (indicated by other stats) you might as well kiss the baby b/c you won't be seeing many Ws.

Jake as an individual has more turnovers than 84% of the teams in the NFL.

As a team, the offense is averaging 3.5 a game.

Those do matter as a they show what is wrong in Carolina and why there are more Ls than Ws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake's number is too alarming not to single him out.

Wins may be the all important stat....but if you don't address the problems (indicated by other stats) you might as well kiss the baby b/c you won't be seeing many Ws.

Jake as an individual has more turnovers than 84% of the teams in the NFL.

As a team, the offense is averaging 3.5 a game.

Those do matter as a they show what is wrong in Carolina and why there are more Ls than Ws.

First of all your presumption is lame to begin with. Football is a team sport so looking at individual stats doesn't make much sense. Plus if you look at another stat, Jake's poor performances make sense. Through 4 games we have given up 10 sacks which is half what we gave up all of last year. Poor offensive line play is a huge problem with Jake, the run game and the pass game.

Singling out one guy on a team may be fashionable these days but suggests you don't know much about how things in football are linked together or need someone to blame. Either way feel free to carry on. I don't feel the need to beat it up or go on and on. I am going to enjoy this win and look forward to playing better against the Bucs, a team we have owned over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...