Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marvel's Agents of SHIELD


Moorgan

Recommended Posts

So maybe there was a topic but the reboot of this forum deleted it. But the new season started with it's 2 hour premier...and ummmmmm...what? So now they are 100 years in the future and Daisy blew up the planet and they are dealing with being slaves to the Kree? This is going to be the direction for the whole season? They teleported how and why? Was that Hitman guy a Kree in a human suit (really)? This show was always kind of schticky and not to be taken seriously but what the hell is going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This show is great and has gotten better every year, so not sure what you guys talking about lol.

Anyway, that is what the guy told Daisy happened to the Earth or what he believes, it may be something else, who knows what they've been told.   It might tie-in to Infinity War as well.    Just give it some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jangler said:

time travel is an easy way to do nothing. Star Trek 101

The show was actually getting some focus and then time travel. Tune in next year like nothing happened.

It's possible but, considering the last few seasons have been great, give it some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dropped out after season two and just never caught back up with it. It wasn't that I thought the show was bad, it just fell through the cracks. Glad it's still going but not sure if I could catch up with it at this point.

I had been hoping the Inhumans would be good, but apparently they screwed the pooch on that one (sorry Lockjaw).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

I dropped out after season two and just never caught back up with it. It wasn't that I thought the show was bad, it just fell through the cracks. Glad it's still going but not sure if I could catch up with it at this point.

I had been hoping the Inhumans would be good, but apparently they screwed the pooch on that one (sorry Lockjaw).

 

Inhumans is unwatchable. The Gifted is better (mutants I know). Small screen comics can be hard to pull off but there are some good ones out there. Just not the Inhumans...for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moorgan said:

Inhumans is unwatchable. The Gifted is better (mutants I know). Small screen comics can be hard to pull off but there are some good ones out there. Just not the Inhumans...for sure.

The CW has done quite well. The Flash, Arrow and Legends of Tomorrow are excellent. Supergirl is well, getting there but it still lands with an unconvincing clank.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

The CW has done quite well. The Flash, Arrow and Legends of Tomorrow are excellent. Supergirl is well, getting there but it still lands with an unconvincing clank.

 

I've not watched any of the DC ones. Wasn't a fan of the comics so didn't feel a real pull to watch the shows. But I have been tempted at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moorgan said:

I've not watched any of the DC ones. Wasn't a fan of the comics so didn't feel a real pull to watch the shows. But I have been tempted at times.

They're really well done. They get right what the movies miss out on -- fun.

I'd suggest start with The Flash. It's the best of the bunch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...