Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No prospect screams "WR1" to me after cursory glance


top dawg

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Not really, we just agree that on getting a WR who has a proven track record vs a guy coming off an abysmal year with a than good qb in Kirk cousins. I also think landry is a good WR, but I’ve said in mutiple threads I’d go after Allen Robinson or marquise Lee, than sign either Meredith or Enuwu since they are coming off injury. I’ve also said although I like Landry he cpuld

possblie make cmc and Samuel obselete

I mean,  I wouldn't hate Meredith or Enunwa for competition purposes, but I don't think they're as appealing as Pryor, and I don't think that either one can do for us what Samuel can if he stays healthy.  But,  who knows?  I just don't believe they're even as good as what we already have. 

Every last one of them,  except Pryor, has an injury history,  so you'd also have to look at that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Trill OG said:

WOW please stop using this account.

If you’re too blind to see that I’ve agree with you more than you once so be it, we disagree on Pryor and that Landry is worth a look,  ur we agree he is most likey gonna get paid by a team with more cap and I question whether putting him on the outside would hamper his production. But his skill set is built for outside play 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Naw because unlike those two I think a guy like Landry you move around similar to cmc, he’s a more polish version of cmc in the reciving department imo

Cpt they are similar talent guys.. All great  hand great route runners.. And I actually think Landry is the quicker of the 3... Hopkins and Allen line up outside why can't Landry??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

You don't think Samuels can line up outside sometimes and you miss and match depending on the play? Especially with Samuels speed and probably running the 9 route and deep digs and comebacks??

Samuel is a big ?, just like Pryor imo, he’s a guy you can say that only can play the slot, didn’t see much from him the past season to make me think otherwise before injury. He has all the potential in the world to be that guy but man I can’t put too much stock in him, plus byrd may have the upper hand as far as lining up outside, he performed pretty damn good before injury on the outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I mean,  I wouldn't hate Meredith or Enunwa for competition purposes, but I don't think they're as appealing as Pryor, and I don't think that either one can do for us what Samuel can if he stays healthy.  But,  who knows?  I just don't believe they're even as good as what we already have. 

Every last one of them,  except Pryor, has an injury history,  so you'd also have to look at that.  

Yeah Meredith and Enuwu would be for competition/ backup plan purposes, both showed damn good potential before injury.Lee has held up the last couple season, and yeah Robinson definitely is a risk but he’s a guy if he comes back healthy has the biggest potential put of all the fa wrs imo. 220 yards in a season with cousins just can’t be ignored, that’s the only thing that turns me off about Pryor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Samuel is a big ?, just like Pryor imo, he’s a guy you can say that only can play the slot, didn’t see much from him the past season to make me think otherwise before injury. He has all the potential in the world to be that guy but man I can’t put too much stock in him, plus byrd may have the upper hand as far as lining up outside, he performed pretty damn good before injury on the outside.

Size doesn't matter when line up??

Smitty was 5'8 and Samuels is bigger than him.. Philly lined up outside.. I think Byrd , Landry and Samuels can be moved around to get the best match up..

Now that you have Norv I think the design of the play will determine who lines up outside..

But Having a guy like Landry who runs great routes has quickness and great hands only helps this offense even more.. Not to mention he will draw the attention of the best CB on other teams regularly..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Cpt they are similar talent guys.. All great  hand great route runners.. And I actually think Landry is the quicker of the 3... Hopkins and Allen line up outside why can't Landry??

I only question if putting him there full time hurts his production, I think moving him around like cmc would work but I’m eager to see him on the outside, I personally think he’ll be alright 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Oh and just to put this out there..

You do know Pryor will be 29 when the season starts next year right??

You really want make that gamble on a 1 year wonder a year from 30???

Lol

I want to post this again to make sure this gets anwsered??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Size doesn't matter when line up??

Smitty was 5'8 and Samuels is bigger than him.. Philly lined up outside.. I think Byrd , Landry and Samuels can be moved around to get the best match up..

Now that you have Norv I think the design of the play will determine who lines up outside..

But Having a guy like Landry who runs great routes has quickness and great hands only helps this offense even more.. Not to mention he will draw the attention of the best CB on other teams regularly..

Yeah it would def be interesting, do you think we could run into a problem like when we had kn and fucnchess ? Two guys with similar skills sets in byrd and Samuel, Landry and cmc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cpt slay a ho said:

I only question if putting him there full time hurts his production, I think moving him around like cmc would work but I’m eager to see him on the outside, I personally think he’ll be alright 

I agree.. And it will garner the attention of other teams top cb...

And moving him around will be great as well..

But let me be clear .. My 1st choice is find a way to get Flash Gordon with out using high picks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Yeah it would def be interesting, do you think we could run into a problem like when we had kn and fucnchess ? Two guys with similar skills sets in byrd and Samuel, Landry and cmc 

No none of these guys are the same player.. Samuels is more like a stronger Ginn.. Landry is like Hopkins and day one is your number1 .. Funch can be a better version of Sanu and your big WR... And Cmc is your Reggie Buch..

Or perfect example.. Remember the Saints 2006 offense??

Colston = Funch

Samuels = Devery Henderson

Landry = Lance Moore/Joe Horn

CMC = Reggie Bush

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2018 at 11:11 AM, FugAllY'all said:

This obsession over WR1 is unhelpful. The Packers won 2 Super Bowls without anyone who would be a considered a WR1. The Patriots have won 5 without a WR1. The problem with our team isn't that we're missing some superstar on the outside, it's that 3/4 starters shouldn't even be on an NFL roster. How many Super Bowls did the Lions win with Calvin Johnson? Or the Bengals with AJ Green? We need 3-4 quality starters who fit our system and to stop putting guys like Brenton Bersin and Kaelin Clay out there.

Exactly. I have been saying this for years. But lots of Madden players around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...