Spagnuolo claims Patriots knew Eagles' signals in Super Bowl XXXIX

[TN05]

1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

All three teams changed their signals in their pre-SB walkthroughs, and also implemented several brand new plays never shown before that the Patriots magically knew what they were before the snap. Players, coaches, front office members from all three teams (and mot of whom are proven classy people who wouldn't just be salty about losing) have alluded to that fact. 

The Eagles prepared a gameplan specifically using the dime defense. They rarely used the dime defense before that game, and there is literally no way the Pats could have predicted it. Not only did they predict it, they knew exactly what to do and how to exploit it.

There's game planning, and there is signal theft.

[JARROD]

Just now, thomas96 said:

All three teams changed their signals in their pre-SB walkthroughs, and also implemented several brand new plays never shown before that the Patriots magically knew what they were before the snap. Players, coaches, front office members from all three teams (and mot of whom are proven classy people who wouldn't just be salty about losing) have alluded to that fact. 

If they added new plays and changed their snaps,.. then they just got beaten plain and simple. 

Just like in sales where I am, when you have some that run away doing much better than others, then the losers claim it’s “a numbers game” or “they are getting fed better leads”

just sour grapes. Play better, get better coaches.

garbage

[t96]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I figure somewhere down the road, there'll be a big expose' where either an investigation or a longtime member of the Patriots organization will reveal the full depth of the Patriots cheating.

It'll probably be a long time coming, but I won't be the least bit surprised if it happens.

And if that info does get out, it'll likely be the single biggest scandal in sports history.

Matt Walsh knows A LOT more than he said back in 2008. And he's been so silent you could hear a pin drop since then. I'm 95% sure he not only knows a lot more but has evidence of it, and will go public with it in the future.

[JARROD]

Just now, TN05 said:

The Eagles prepared a gameplan specifically using the dime defense. They rarely used the dime defense before that game, and there is literally no way the Pats could have predicted it. Not only did they predict it, they knew exactly what to do and how to exploit it.

There's game planning, and there is signal theft.

Gee, and Rex Ryan put similar defenses against Brady and beat them in the AFC Championship.

it wasn’t stolen signals, the eagles just suck. 

Losers always make excuses.

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, JARROD said:

Gee, and Rex Ryan put similar defenses against Brady and beat them in the AFC Championship.

it wasn’t stolen signals, the eagles just suck. 

Losers always make excuses.

Does everybody they've beaten just suck?

There's a pattern here. It's also no accident that opponents audio equipment in Gillette Stadium has an odd tendency to malfunction at crucial times.

[KillerKat]

3 minutes ago, JARROD said:

If they added new plays and changed their snaps,.. then they just got beaten plain and simple. 

Just like in sales where I am, when you have some that run away doing much better than others, then the losers claim it’s “a numbers game” or “they are getting fed better leads”

just sour grapes. Play better, get better coaches.

garbage

Thanks for proving you are stupid as poo when it comes to sports.

[JARROD]

4 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

You can try to down play it all you want, but knowing another teams signals is HUGE. It's very difficult to just change on the fly. Comparing this to your Earnhardt example is retarded as fug.

Obviously you don’t know what you are talking about— 

[JARROD]

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

Thanks for proving you are stupid as poo when it comes to sports.

Ok so I’m stupid for disagreeing with you goobers about being totally idiotic and ridiculous about a team winning because of signals?

Grow up buttercup

[TN05]

Another example: in the 2001 Super Bowl, the Rams pre-game walkthrough - which the Pats recorded - showed something the Pats could have not possibly predicted. Marshall Faulk, then the most electrifying player in the game, lined up as a kick returner.

In his entire career, he had only returned one kickoff in his entire career. There's no way they could have seen it coming, let alone planned for it.

What did the Pats do when he lined up to return in the second half? Kick a perfectly placed corner kickoff that Faulk was unable properly return.

The Rams had also installed brand-new red zone plays they had never ran before. Keep in mind that, at the time, Mike Martz was probably the best and most ingenious offensive coordinator in the league. His playbook was varied and unpredictable.

Guess how the Pats did against these new plays? They lined up perfectly and stopped them, knowing exactly who to cover. Our 2003 team made similar complaints.

Martz was heavily pressured to side with the league, and did so reluctantly. Now he's come out and said that he didn't say much of what the league said he did, and that something was fishy about the game.

[JARROD]

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Does everybody they've beaten just suck?

There's a pattern here. It's also no accident that opponents audio equipment in Gillette Stadium has an odd tendency to malfunction at crucial times.

I thought that was Atlanta, can you keep yourself straight?

and yes they have been better at winning than everyone else.

[Mr. Scot]

1 minute ago, JARROD said:

I thought that was Atlanta, can you keep yourself straight?

and yes they have been better at winning than everyone else.

Actually I can.  Atlanta got in trouble for pumping in crowd noise, not interfering with audio equipment.

[JARROD]

2 minutes ago, TN05 said:

Another example: in the 2001 Super Bowl, the Rams pre-game walkthrough - which the Pats recorded - showed something the Pats could have not possibly predicted. Marshall Faulk, then the most electrifying player in the game, lined up as a kick returner.

In his entire career, he had only returned one kickoff in his entire career. There's no way they could have seen it coming, let alone planned for it.

What did the Pats do when he lined up to return in the second half? Kick a perfectly placed corner kickoff that Faulk was unable properly return.

The Rams had also installed brand-new red zone plays they had never ran before. Keep in mind that, at the time, Mike Martz was probably the best and most ingenious offensive coordinator in the league. His playbook was varied and unpredictable.

Guess how the Pats did against these new plays? They lined up perfectly and stopped them, knowing exactly who to cover. Our 2003 team made similar complaints.

So an entire season of tape to watch and tendencies didn’t help?

i believe some teams just scheme better and make in game changes better than others.

make adjustments, make them early and often— failure to adapt is the devil.

[Mr. Scot]

At least five teams have accused the Patriots of headset tampering

That's not an example of "being better".

If you're legitimately just better, you don't need to do s--t like this to win.

If you do need s--t like this to win, you're not better.

[TN05]

Just now, JARROD said:

So an entire season of tape to watch and tendencies didn’t help?

i believe some teams just scheme better and make in game changes better than others.

make adjustments, make them early and often— failure to adapt is the devil.

You can't fugging gameplan for plays you've never seen before. You can (and will) succeed against some, but not all. And you sure as hell won't know what is happening on all of them.

What makes Luke Kuechly great is he can predict offenses. He does this without cheating.

What made Peyton Manning great was he could predict defense. He did this without cheating.