Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you want a good Gettleman laugh this morning


Yaboychris28

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

We can talk about it...sorry I stepped on you...

Evidently we can’t. When you offer an explanation for your comment, we can. But you have no interest in saying what you really meant. Not a good look for the agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Evidently we can’t. When you offer an explanation for your comment, we can. But you have no interest in saying what you really meant. Not a good look for the agenda.

No explanation needed...I said what I meant and meant what I said...I have no interest in saying what you want it to mean...your deflection is cute...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

No explanation needed...I said what I meant and meant what I said...I have no interest in saying what you want it to mean...your deflection is cute...

 

Yes of course. My deflection. If you didn’t mean what I stated, one would think you could come up with an easy explanation. You said it. Again implies that the organization let it go too far st another time. When was this? I’m sure you have no interest in staying the truth and looking like an idiot. Not hard for anyone to read that and know exactly what you meant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Yes of course. My deflection. If you didn’t mean what I stated, one would think you could come up with an easy explanation. You said it. Again implies that the organization let it go too far st another time. When was this? I’m sure you have no interest in staying the truth and looking like an idiot. Not hard for anyone to read that and know exactly what you meant. 

Yes you were deflecting...the pt was about G-man...the subject was Gman...you were wrong so you tried to change the subject...we can  talk about Hurney ...I have no particular affection for him...what do you want to know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Yes you were deflecting...the pt was about G-man...the subject was Gman...you were wrong so you tried to change the subject...we can  talk about Hurney ...I have no particular affection for him...what do you want to know

 Fine. Then what did you mean about Gman when you said “again”. Did they fire him twice? Explain that?

  And what was i wrong about? The no back to back losing season? The 1’winning season in Hurneys last 7 years? Their actual records? That there accomplishments are not comparable. Please do tell. Because the only thing you’ve done is d CLE this away from sticking your foot in your mouth. Nothin disputing my facts besides some “feelings”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

 Fine. Then what did you mean about Gman when you said “again”. Did they fire him twice? Explain that?

  And what was i wrong about? The no back to back losing season? The 1’winning season in Hurneys last 7 years? Their actual records? That there accomplishments are not comparable. Please do tell. Because the only thing you’ve done is d CLE this away from sticking your foot in your mouth. Nothin disputing my facts besides some “feelings”. 

FYI: The guy you're arguing with is just a numbskull who says stupid things and then acts like they meant something.

I'm not sure if he's just a troll or has some sort of developmental disability. Either one is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 Fine. Then what did you mean about Gman when you said “again”. Did they fire him twice? Explain that?

  And what was i wrong about? The no back to back losing season? The 1’winning season in Hurneys last 7 years? Their actual records? That there accomplishments are not comparable. Please do tell. Because the only thing you’ve done is d CLE this away from sticking your foot in your mouth. Nothin disputing my facts besides some “feelings”. 

So you want to talk about G-man..ok..no they didn't fire him twice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

FYI: The guy you're arguing with is just a numbskull who says stupid things and then acts like they meant something.

I'm not sure if he's just a troll or has some sort of developmental disability. Either one is possible.

I've been on point...your logical fallacy misses once again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...