Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

INTERESTING draft fact about the SB champion Eagles


SCO96

Recommended Posts

The Eagles have only had on draft choice so far, but the tidbit from he link below knocked me for a loop.

http://www.espn.com/blog/philadelphia-eagles/post/_/id/25105/philadelphia-eagles-2018-draft-analysis-for-every-pick

What’s next: The Eagles know the value of what lies ahead. VP of player personnel Joe Douglas points out 18 of the starters in Super Bowl LII were taken in the fourth round or after. The champs will have plenty of opportunities to mine for Day 3 difference-makers with two fourth-round picks (Nos. 125 and 130 overall), as well as selections in the sixth (No. 206 overall) and seventh (No. 250 overall) rounds.

====

All I can say is wow. The Eagles must have one heck of scouting department. Can you guys imagine Hurney and the Panther Front officebuilding a championship roster In a similar manner?  I’m starting to have doubts about him finding another stater in this year’s draft after the 1st round.

Based on his first stint as GM, Hurney proved that you can’t build a perennial contender on 1st round choices alone. The Pats have gone to the SB in years when they didn’t even have a pick in the first round. You’ve got to find gems in the later rounds if you plan to consistently compete for the Super Bowl and Marty has yet to prove that he can do that. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

The Eagles have only had on draft choice so far, but the tidbit from he link below knocked me for a loop.

http://www.espn.com/blog/philadelphia-eagles/post/_/id/25105/philadelphia-eagles-2018-draft-analysis-for-every-pick

What’s next: The Eagles know the value of what lies ahead. VP of player personnel Joe Douglas points out 18 of the starters in Super Bowl LII were taken in the fourth round or after. The champs will have plenty of opportunities to mine for Day 3 difference-makers with two fourth-round picks (Nos. 125 and 130 overall), as well as selections in the sixth (No. 206 overall) and seventh (No. 250 overall) rounds.

====

All I can say is wow. The Eagles must have one heck of scouting department. Can you guys imagine Hurney and the Panther Front officebuilding a championship roster In a similar manner?  I’m starting to have doubts about him finding another stater in this year’s draft after the 1st round.

Based on his first stint as GM, Hurney proved that you can’t build a perennial contender on 1st round choices alone. The Pats have gone to the SB in years when they didn’t even have a pick in the first round. You’ve got to find gems in the later rounds if you plan to consistently compete for the Super Bowl and Marty has yet to prove that he can do that. 

 

13 of 22 offense/defense starters were 1st or 2nd round picks. 5 starters in rounds 4-7. Special teams is another story.

this just for the eagles

 

patriots had 7 starters on offense/ defense forms rounds 4-7. 

 

4 special team starters plus slot wrs and you have your 18 players from both teams combined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

13 of 22 offense/defense starters were 1st or 2nd round picks. 5 starters in rounds 4-7. Special teams is another story.

this just for the eagles

 

patriots had 7 starters on offense/ defense forms rounds 4-7. 

 

4 special team starters plus slot wea and you have your 18 players from both teams combined. 

Thank You for taking the time to research that. Your information provides a better perspective. I thought that number (18) seemed a little high, but it’s makes more sense if you’re considering the 4-7 rounders who started from BOTH of last years SB participants. The ESPN didn’t specifically say that.

Thanks again. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you're going to try and hold me saying he looks like crap in during his rookie year against me vs me trying to stay positive in the present and say that the hourly posting shitting on him is annoying and confusing because who the hell spends that much time on something they don't enjoy, I can't really help you. you're exaggerating and holding onto the past like a female. you just said in another thread that his excellent games vs the Rams has you feeling guilty for feeling any positivity. that is some true loser stuff right there, definitely not someone that is a fan of something. keep trying. 
    • generally speaking, going by the original NFL international marketing rights announcement... we would expect to host a Germany home game once every four years.  Doesn't mean we would play internationally only then, just the guarantee home game situation things might have changed since then, if they figure out how to play at more stadiums during a season to expand the number of "home" teams available
    • Munich won't happen. It's a Lions home game in Munich, but we play the Lions at home at BOA Most likely to happen would be Madrid vs the Falcons (although KC has been pushing hard for this one). From a schedule perspective, it would be interesting to have an early November Madrid game (then the bye week), then close out the season at BOA for the 2nd game vs the falcons.  In other words, put the two division games in the 2nd half of the season Paris vs the Saints has long been rumored to be the Browns (but... never say never) We wouldn't play Munich, Melbourne, Mexico City, London, or Rio based on who those announced home teams happen to be  
×
×
  • Create New...