CJ Anderson

[Ace_Aladdin]

5 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Actually how many total carries were there?

i mean if C had 13( 3 being the kneeldowns) so 10, CMac 10 and CJ 7, 27 true carries,.. how many more can they give out?

If Cam hadn’t run 7 times before halftime for 64 yards I believe I saw, our drives don’t get sustained.

our opening drive should have been 7, stifled by the goal line fumble— that drive Cam was a monster,..

The offense had 2 many 3 & outs if they  can move the chains that means more snaps = more carries for the RBs.

The receiving game was trash without Olsen so why not utilize him in that area where he excelled in the game most and let C.J. do the hard running. This would ease pressure on CAM. 

[TheCasillas]

Just now, Fox007 said:

What's up with these dishonest clowns. The CMC fumbled play was nothing close to a TD...woulda been a TFL the DL was on him as soon as he got the ball, how you morons figure that woulda been a TD in any possible fugin way....

I think they are referring to the fact if he didn’t fumble the ball we would have had another chance to score.

[Ace_Aladdin]

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

I think they are referring to the fact if he didn’t fumble the ball we would have had another chance to score.

CMC is the best reciver on this team with Olsen out.

[TheCasillas]

Just now, Ace_Aladdin said:

CMC is the best reciver on this team with Olsen out.

Ok?

[Fox007]

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I think they are referring to the fact if he didn’t fumble the ball we would have had another chance to score.

He said TD and the fumble was on 3rd and 2....FG not TD.

[Ace_Aladdin]

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Ok?

So if all of the receivers are sucking and C.J. is getting 5 yards a carry why not air it out with CMC instead of trying to run him. 

[TheCasillas]

2 minutes ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

So if all of the receivers are sucking and C.J. is getting 5 yards a carry why not air it out with CMC instead of trying to run him. 

What did I say for you to start this topic of discussion with me? I don’t think I mentioned any of the above. 

[JARROD]

8 minutes ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

The offense had 2 many 3 & outs if they  can move the chains that means more snaps = more carries for the RBs.

The receiving game was trash without Olsen so why not utilize him in that area where he excelled in the game most and let C.J. do the hard running. This would ease pressure on CAM. 

Still,.. 27 carries not counting Kneel downs by Cam, CMac and CJ,..

how many more could they get in a game?

[Ace_Aladdin]

13 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Still,.. 27 carries not counting Kneel downs by Cam, CMac and CJ,..

how many more could they get in a game?

15 more if you add in 2 more drives instead of 3 and outs. 

Stop running CAM if Panthers wants to win game agaisnt top tier teams that can put up more than 8 pts. 

[JARROD]

1 minute ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

15 more if you add in 2 more drives instead of 3 and outs. 

So 15 more carries and zero passes for 2 more drives?

go to the wing T, forward pass be damned!

[Ace_Aladdin]

1 minute ago, JARROD said:

So 15 more carries and zero passes for 2 more drives?

go to the wing T, forward pass be damned!

Panthers started at the 25 yds they usally take 10 snaps before they reach endzone.

Balanced play call and you get 10-12 carries. 

 

[NAS]

He should have gotten the ball at the goal line when CMC fumbled.  Nothing against CMC but CJ is the better choice for short yardage situations like that. 

[JARROD]

Just now, Ace_Aladdin said:

Panthers started at the 25 yds they usally take 10 snaps before they reach endzone.

 

My bad... 2.5 passes per drive and 7.5 carries then?

[Ace_Aladdin]

Just now, JARROD said:

My bad... 2.5 passes per drive and 7.5 carries then?

or 5 passes and 5 runs and no read options idiot.