Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes or No- Should John Fox be fired if we go less than 9-7?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

less than. its in the title

oops, so 8-8 at best then....

Yes. Fired. What you want in a HC is a consistant guy that can lead you to consecutive winning seasons and playoff births. Fox has had long enough to acheive back to back winning seasons and the only excuse he will have this year is poor coaching/player management as an excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Fox had nothing to do with Jake getting resigned and basically wasting 20mil?

Thank you, his azz should be fired as well as the GM. I was sick to my stomach when they gave Joke D that extension. They gave an extension to the worst starting QB in the NFL.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, his azz should be fired as well as the GM. I was sick to my stomach when they gave Joke D that extension. They gave an extension to the worst starting QB in the NFL.!

at the time they gave the extension to a QB who was on the backside of his career, an older QB who was coming off his first year after Tommy John and didn't look like his arm was the same, and who was coming off a career crippling performance that he will never mentally recover from.

only now is his the worst starting QB....but there were plenty of signs pointing not to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mike Shanahan can be fired after winning multiple superbowls, than so can John Fox, with 0. my whole thing is 0 back to back winning seasons (if we go < 9-7). I only wish Josh McDaniels had waited until 2010 to leave New England. i want an offensive minded head coach. idk why i just do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I'm still not sure about Canales' play calling but I'll give him another season. Still can't quite figure out why you think Young won't work out. His numbers with Theilen are as good as any QB Theien's ever had - including the three games he has started with Rogers this year. Cokers' numbers are as good as Theilens and he is an UDFA and TMac is in the run for ORTY with Young as his QB. Young's throwing more accurately now (from 21.5% in 23 to 16.5% this year) and he has shown he can make the throws in clutch moments. If you take into account he was saddled with XL, Chark, Mingo and Johnson for receivers at one point, had a coaching staff his first year that didn't want him and a current coach who is suspect at play calling, I'm not sure he has been as bad as people here say. I know he has had terrible moments/games but most qb's still on their rookie contract will.  Anyway, had to give my weekly BY plug. Guess I thought this was the perfect time lol.
    • He missed a lot of time. Was slow getting back up to speed. And we have an offense that is not exactly WR friendly so his targets were low.  How many targets does anyone get when you have 120 yards passing, 54 yards passing, 160 yards, most of the time? It probably took the time it needed to take.
    • The 5th year option jus gives them a little more time to make their decision and figure out the position going forward.  The idea that it means hes def gonna get a extension is asinine.
×
×
  • Create New...