Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jay Glazer talking about Pep


jramsey4

Recommended Posts

Well that was your first mistake' date=' I don't even start watching pregame till noon. Fox>ESPN when it comes to pregame shows.[/quote']

ah yes, but at 11, there isn't anything on.. plus it involves football, you know I'm watching it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that was your first mistake' date=' I don't even start watching pregame till noon. Fox>ESPN when it comes to pregame shows.[/quote']

Thats because fox focuses on the NFC while CBS focuses on the AFC because thats the games they are allowed to show. ESPN has to cover both which means that a lot of Panther stuff gets brushed under the rug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats because fox focuses on the NFC while CBS focuses on the AFC because thats the games they are allowed to show. ESPN has to cover both which means that a lot of Panther stuff gets brushed under the rug.

ESPN spends more time on Drew Brees' pregame cheer then actually analyzing games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is the best leader on D we have every had. Well at least since Mills

I agree. It's amazing how in the first 10 picks in the 1st round of the '07 Draft, no one pick Beason. I bet several teams that pass on him & don't have a good LB like him are kicking themself now. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah yes, but at 11, there isn't anything on.. plus it involves football, you know I'm watching it..

i use the dvr's set reminder function. that way i don't miss any of fox. just a suggestion.

definitely was good to hear that Pep stepped up, and was accountable for his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...