Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Isn’t it ironic...


TN05

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

Plain and simple we played just as many backups as they did.. And now ppl are bitching because the backups won..lol

It's because these people are miserable people who are never happy about everything. 

The dirty secret is these people actually love it when we lose. It gives them something to distract from their meaningless, banal lives and lets them feel superior for a few minutes online. We could win the Super Bowl and these people wouldn't be happy, because nothing makes them happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Plain and simple we played just as many backups as they did.. And now ppl are bitching because the backups won..lol

That's not even remotely true. We played our entire starting defense, besides Short for a large portion of the game. We also played every starter we could on offense. Sean Payton took out I think six players after a single drive. That's not accounting for the 3 or 4 players he already had inactive, including both starting tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Plain and simple we played just as many backups as they did.. And now ppl are bitching because the backups won..lol

Also, who gives a poo who we're playing. I stated the SAINTS did not try to win. They sat their most important players, and schemed a game against their players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

That's not even remotely true. We played our entire starting defense, besides Short for a large portion of the game. We also played every starter we could on offense. 

Except Funchess and McCaffery and our starting quarterback and our Pro Bowl guard... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TN05 said:

Except Funchess and McCaffery and our starting quarterback and our Pro Bowl guard... 

Funchess is trash. McCaffrey started, but Ron took him out after almost getting injured, but then was willing to play him at quarterback. Oh, and Trai is hurt.

But who fuging cares, the Saints took out so many healthy starters, BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT THE RECORD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

That's not even remotely true. We played our entire starting defense, besides Short for a large portion of the game. We also played every starter we could on offense. Sean Payton took out I think six players after a single drive. That's not accounting for the 3 or 4 players he already had inactive, including both starting tackles.

They played most of their starting defense longer than ours.. And their number 1 WR TE and 2 RB played more than ours.. What did you want to do?? Find a HS team to take our place today??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sub Zero said:

They played most of their starting defense longer than ours.. And their number 1 WR TE and 2 RB played more than ours.. What did you want to do?? Find a HS team to take our place today??

The Saints didn't play Brees, didn't play Kamara, and didn't want to win. If you want to make the argument that they seriously cared about this record, keep doing so, but it's simply not logical. Their best two players on offense were sat, the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

The Saints didn't play Brees, didn't play Kamara, and didn't want to win. If you want to make the argument that they seriously cared about this record, keep doing so, but it's simply not logical. Their best two players on offense were sat, the end.

And we played our 4th QB .. Again did you want Ron to asked Jake if he could take some snaps??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...