Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some coaches take responsibility, others just riverboat


LinvilleGorge

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nah. Just illustrating that you don't know what you're talking about.

Granted, you illustrate that much better than I do.

Since you can’t attack arguments and can only attack people, I will now shift my debating tactics to mirror yours. You just let me know if I sound intelligent or not. Here goes nothing!!

Oh cool...whatever. You clearly don’t get it, I don’t want to waste any more time explaining these simple ideas to you since you’ve never even coached pee-wee football. Are you talking dumb or do you really think dumb too? I’m done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MasterAwesome said:

Since you can’t attack arguments and can only attack people, I will now shift my debating tactics to mirror yours. You just let me know if I sound intelligent or not. Here goes nothing!!

Oh cool...whatever. You clearly don’t get it, I don’t want to waste any more time explaining these simple ideas to you since you’ve never even coached pee-wee football. Are you talking dumb or do you really think dumb too? I’m done.

The ideas have been explained to you by more than one person, so that answers that question pretty easily.

Like I said, doesn't matter whether you're acting dumb to be an ass or genuinely dumb, the result is the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

You’re in the same boat as those people who follow other people around from thread to thread just to poop each one of their posts.

Oh hey @raz! We were just talking about you....right on cue! Hey let me know what you disagree with and we can have a nice discussion! Or not...you know, it’s up to you! Thanks for stopping by! Hope to see you in the next thread :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The ideas have been explained to you by more than one person, so that answers that question pretty easily.

Like I said, doesn't matter whether you're acting dumb to be an ass or genuinely dumb, the result is the same.

Like I said, I talked the ideas smarter back to you and you just aren’t getting it. People are pieing me too, so you know I’m right and you’re wrong. But whatever...I’m done. I don’t have time for this and you’re really not that important to me. Just don’t post anymore or else I’ll respond again in a minute though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Like I said, I talked the ideas smarter back to you and you just aren’t getting it. People are pieing me too, so you know I’m right and you’re wrong. But whatever...I’m done. I don’t have time for this and you’re really not that important to me. Just don’t post anymore or else I’ll respond again in a minute though.

Nah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MasterAwesome said:

Nope...you’re not even worth a response. Not counting this one. Or the next one.

(on a side note: your tactics are very empowering...I definitely feel like I’m winning the argument now!!)

I wouldn't trust your feelings on this one, especially not given that you seem to be the only person who's stated that he doesn't understand how this works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

You know more than you think.

Rivera's Super Bowl, and pretty much all of his successful seasons, came when Dave Gettleman was managing the roster.

When he's paired with Marty Hurney though, yikes.

 

Here we go again with the Gettlemagic BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Is what I said incorrect?

Not incorrect, but misleading--there are too many variables to suggest that there is a 100% correlation between coach/GM success--in the same year.

Granted over a longer period your argument is valid, but not for one year here or there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ras977 said:

Not incorrect, but misleading--there are too many variables to suggest that there is a 100% correlation between coach/GM success--in the same year.

Granted over a longer period your argument is valid, but not for one year here or there.

 

Gettleman was here for four seasons and ran five offseasons. Four of those five years we made the playoffs.

Marty Hurney and Ron Rivera have teamed together for three seasons. Every one of those seasons ended with a losing record. 

Prior to Rivera, only three of the eleven years Marty Hurney was paired with John Fox produced winning seasons.

At what point do you accept there being a trend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

McVay after losing the SB:

"I'm almost numb … They did great job but it was mostly result of me doing a poor job calling plays and not giving us a chance to win."

Rivera after losing any game:

"Missed opportunities... players have to make plays..."

Amen, amen, and amen, brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Gettleman was here for four seasons and ran five offseasons. Four of those five years we made the playoffs.

Marty Hurney and Ron Rivera have teamed together for three seasons. Every one of those seasons ended with a losing record. 

Prior to Rivera, only three of the eleven years Marty Hurney was paired with John Fox produced winning seasons.

At what point do you accept there being a trend?

never, and so what you're saying is he praises great players and throws lousy ones under the bus.  how can i walk to school and take my lunch? do you not see what i'm saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...