Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prospects with multple or private visits with Panthers


MHS831

Recommended Posts

  • ·  Brian Burns, DE/3-4OLB/OLB, Florida State (PRI)
  • ·  Nate Davis^, OT, Charlotte (LOC, COM)
  • ·  Andre Dillard, OT, Washington State (PRI)
  • ·  Will Grier^, QB, West Virginia (COM, PRO)
  • ·  Tytus Howard, OT, Alabama State (PRI)
  • ·  Dre'Mont Jones, DT, Ohio State (PRI)
  • ·  Greg Little^, OT, Ole Miss (COM, PRO)
  • ·  Erik McCoy^, G/C, Texas A&M (SR, PRI)
  • ·  Deebo Samuel^, WR, South Carolina (COM, LOC)
  • ·  Khalen Saunders, DT, Western Illinois (PRI)
  • ·  Darnell Savage, S, Maryland (PRI)
  • ·  Montez Sweat^, DE/3-4OLB/OLB, Mississippi State (PRO, PRI)
  • ·  Clayton Thorson^, QB, Northwestern (PRO, PRI)
  •  Kaleb McGary, OT Washington (PRI?)
  • Jonathan Abrams, S Miss St (Pri?)

 

Take it for what it is worth, but we usually grab a player or two from the visit list with multiple visits--not sure that the LOC (local) means a lot, but the private workouts and multiple visits demonstrate potential high interest.

From this list, I would think the favorites are:

 

  • Round 1:  Sweat or Burns (Edge)  
  • Round 2: McCoy (G.C); Little (T/G); Jones (DT/5 tech--some  say higher, but I think he is a second rounder) 
  • Round 3: Savage (S-some say he is a second rounder); Grier (QB); Howard (T); Saunders (DT)
  • Round 4:  Davis (G/T); Thorson (QB)

Walter Football is not always accurate or thorough; again, take this for what it is worth.  Some may have players sitting higher, but this is my  opinion.  Add to this if this is missing players.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm awfully nervous at 16 if Sweat and Burns are both gone. I want no part of Dillard or Little in the 1st.

Dremont Jones scares me in round 1 too.  I would rather have Ford than Dillard-he would be a LG day 1 who could backup T.  Reminds me of Wharton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Agreed. With his lack of run support right now and poor combine he is out of the first round discussion. 

Me too.  Could not figure out why we brought him in--maybe to see if the combine was a fluke?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also add McGary and now Abrams’ to that list

  1. OT – Tytus Howard, Alabama State
  2. C – Erik McCoy, Texas A&M
  3. OT – Kaleb McGary, Washington
  4. DT – Dre’Mont Jones, Ohio State
  5. S – Darnell Savage, Maryland
  6. DE – Brian Burns, Florida State
  7. DE – Montez Sweat, Mississippi State
  8. S – Taylor Rapp, Washington
  9. OT – Andre Dillard, Washington State
  10. DT – Khalen Saunders, Western Illinois
  11. QB – Clayton Thorson, Northwestern

Visits That Did Not Count Towards The 30 (Local Workout/Visits):

  • DE – Clelin Ferrell, Clemson
  • WR – Deebo Samuel, South Carolina
  • CB – Keisean Nixon, South Carolina
  • OG – Zack Bailey, South Carolina
  • WR – Anthony Ratliff-Williams, North Carolina
  • CB – Clifton Duck, Appalachian State
  • RB – Jalin Moore, Appalachian State
  • OG – Phil Haynes, Wake Forest
  • WR – Greg Dortch, Wake Forest
  • C – Ryan Anderson, Wake Forest
  • OG – Nate Davis, Charlotte

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm awfully nervous at 16 if Sweat and Burns are both gone. I want no part of Dillard or Little in the 1st.

If so, I hope we trade back--assuming some stud does not fall---which might happen if those 2 are gone--someone like Gary, White, or Greedy could be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm awfully nervous at 16 if Sweat and Burns are both gone. I want no part of Dillard or Little in the 1st.

I’m right there with you... I’d rather go corner or dt at that point...or Cody ford if I just had to take an olineman right there 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, poorboysrev said:

I’m right there with you... I’d rather go corner or dt at that point...or Cody ford if I just had to take an olineman right there 

I love Ford--perfect for our needs--only  if DL we need gone.  Lotta people think he will go late first--early second--he will surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I love Ford--perfect for our needs--only  if DL we need gone.  Lotta people think he will go late first--early second--he will surprise.

I agree..at least he has one defined position...if he grows into a tackle great... but a road grading LG would solidify our oline and make it a strength for the first time in forever. The colts and Dallas doing that changed their team around in a hurry. But like you said I’d go DL first if the value’s still there. I know people are down on Ferrell cause he doesn’t jump great in gym shorts but if sweat and burns are both gone I’d have to figure he’s there. I don’t watch college really besides the title game and he looked good to me. Might not have the giant Peppers upside but a workhorse Jared allen type that’s ready to go day 1... I’m not crying about that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...