Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

6 for 6!!


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

still not even. this is a regular season game that holds very little importance. their win sent them on a run to the superbowl. this win, doesn't erase our embarrassing loss last year, it just means we're now 3 and 4 and playing the undefeated saints in new orleans next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

still not even. this is a regular season game that holds very little importance. their win sent them on a run to the superbowl. this win, doesn't erase our embarrassing loss last year, it just means we're now 3 and 4 and playing the undefeated saints in new orleans next week.

^buzzkill^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

still not even. this is a regular season game that holds very little importance. their win sent them on a run to the superbowl. this win, doesn't erase our embarrassing loss last year, it just means we're now 3 and 4 and playing the undefeated saints in new orleans next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

little importance?? don't you realize that with a loss we have no chance at contending? besides, even though they went, the cardinals didn't win the SB.

really? but it sure would have been cool to go instead of losing a home game in round 1 as the favorite after going 8-0 at home during the season. but hey, at least the cardinals didn't win the SB so no worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

still not even. this is a regular season game that holds very little importance. their win sent them on a run to the superbowl. this win, doesn't erase our embarrassing loss last year, it just means we're now 3 and 4 and playing the undefeated saints in new orleans next week.

No, it's not equal to a playoff win, but it will maybe show the team (and us) they CAN play toe to toe with the Cards and win.

THIS is what I envisioned our game with them back in January to look like.

Maybe our guys will be fired up from here on out and play like the 12-4 team we were last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really? but it sure would have been cool to go instead of losing a home game in round 1 as the favorite after going 8-0 at home during the season. but hey, at least the cardinals didn't win the SB so no worries.

to be quite honest, in a playoff game where you get completely embarrassed by a team, you'd actually want that team to win it all so you know at least you lost to the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • “Y’all been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this.”
    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
×
×
  • Create New...