Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Mike McCarthy was interviewed after the Colts game


(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Lawrence Taylor was the original prototype for today's 3-4 OLB. Do you think he invented the 3-4?

Apples and Oranges ..

Bill Walsh took Johnny Unitas offensive philosophy, which is an offense based on timing and footwork and named it the West-Coast Offense. 

The Unitas Offense is more appropriate than West-Coast Offense because the WCO is exactly what Unitas was trying to do to defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Lawrence Taylor was the original prototype for today's 3-4 OLB. Do you think he invented the 3-4?

Was Taylor a friend of Jerry Richardson? :thinking:

Also, for the record, I'm not real clear on how any association with Jerry Richardson would help anyone given that Tepper deliberately removed every reference to Jerry Richardson (minus the statue) from the building shortly after taking over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeaaaahhh...Uuuhhh, Johnny Unitas didn't invent the West Coast Offense...or any offense.  He never coached.

The West Coast Offense that McCarthy runs is attributed to Bill Walsh.

 

Wait a minute.....I thought Vinz Clortho was the Keymaster of Gozer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Was Taylor a friend of Jerry Richardson? :thinking:

Also, for the record, I'm not real clear on how any association with Jerry Richardson would help anyone given that Tepper deliberately removed every reference to Jerry Richardson (minus the statue) from the building shortly after taking over.

Tepper is exactly who Richardson wanted to take over if you don't believe that you can't put two and two together.

The whole thing was framed to make JR look like he was getting the poo end of the deal, when in reality, behind all the fake media, he was getting the perfect guy to buy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

Tepper is exactly who Richardson wanted to take over if you don't believe that you can't put two and two together.

The whole thing was framed to make JR look like he was getting the poo end of the deal, when in reality, behind all the fake media, he was getting the perfect guy to buy.

Not according to his son, who I suspect has better sources than you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not according to his son, who I suspect has better sources than you.

The idea was to portray it to the public that Richardson was getting what he deserved and screwed. His son was just buying into what the narrative was to the public.

Richardson ended up selling to the guy who is the richest among the rich owners, and who is from Pittsburgh and out of the Steelers organization .. the facts say Richardson wasn't getting screwed he in fact got the perfect deal if you read into it a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

The idea was to portray it to the public that Richardson was getting what he deserved and screwed. His son was just buying into what the narrative was to the public.

Richardson ended up selling to the guy who is the richest among the rich owners, and who is from Pittsburgh and out of the Steelers organization .. the facts say Richardson wasn't getting screwed he in fact got the perfect deal if you read into it a little.

Richardson ended up selling to the guy that made the lowest bid because that was who the league wanted.

He also went into the process thinking he'd get three million and got nowhere close to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...