Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star Trek Movie Sequel News

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Huddle Lounge

What do you think the next movie should be about?  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think the next movie should be about?

    • Write a whole new story
      6
    • Combine a couple of old episodes around a new story
      1
    • Just have Kirk sexing up green women
      5
    • Kirk and Spock finally admit their love for one another
      0
    • pie
      2

Recommended Posts

Jangler Apprentice

Jangler

Posted
Posted

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/11/02/exclusive-jj-abrams-talks-about-the-possibility-of-recasting-khan-for-star-trek-sequel/

J.J. Abrams nailed the recasting of "Star Trek" icons James T. Kirk and Spock for his big screen reboot this past May. The question, "Who in the world could possibly replace William Shatner on the Enterprise flight deck?" was answered with the resounding cry, "Holy crap is Chris Pine good!"

With these casting achievements behind him, Abrams knows he's opened up some creative leeway in terms of replacing characters in the mythology. Could that lead to another go at the franchise's #1 villain, Khan? In a recent interview, Abrams admitted taking on the genetic superfreak would be a challenge, but one no bigger than ushering in new versions of Kirk and Spock.

"I think one of the byproducts of doing this movie was we were able to dispel the obvious and understandable concerns—how can 'Star Trek' possibly exist without those original cast members?" the director explained during a recent interview with MTV's Josh Horowitz. "Now that we are in a parallel existence with what fans of the original series love so much, we could introduce any number of characters, settings, references and situations that the original series introduced. Dealing with Khan would certainly be a challenge, but we had an equal challenge in finding our crew of the Enterprise."

Abrams and his team of writers (Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci and Damon Lindelof) have only just started to discuss story ideas for the sequel. But Abrams promised that in introducing past characters or storylines, the sequel will not become a simple rehashing of old movie or TV episodes.

"While I don’t want to approach the second film as a remake of episodes we’ve seen in the past... nothing is off limits in terms of what we’re discussing," he said. "When Bob Orci and the others who know 'Trek' so well, the fun of working with them is they know this universe so deeply they’re the ones who are always considering what it means to deal with the stuff in the past, so it’ll be exciting."

How do you think Khan should be handled in this new "Star Trek" universe? Do you want to see him in the next sequel? In any subsequent follow-ups? Would you rather see him left out all together?

I have made a poll only because the article asked the question. But there won't be a any Khan because, since we are in an alternate timeline now, Kirk and the Enterprise have not found Khan yet. So what would be the point of just telling that story over, and it wasn't a great episode anyway, but just for fun I thought I would ask...:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matt Foley Newbie

Matt Foley

Posted
Posted

I guess the fact that I have no clue what the fug you all are talking about is a good thing.

In the town I grew up in, Star Trek came on Sunday mornings at 11 a.m. So if you didn't go to church, you pretty much watched it. This was before cable, and the other channels had church services on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DavidEng
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By DavidEng · Posted

      It’s like being on the Flyers broadcast team feed so far
    • philit99
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By philit99 · Posted

      Boy the flyers look good early. Lots of bad plays and slow start by our team. Hope that changes before the score changes.
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes into account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as another treading water year (at QB). I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. That’s how I look at it. 
×
×
  • Create New...