Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers open at +14.5 (love it) and quickly moves to +13.5 (still love it)


AZPanther

Recommended Posts

I think we have a chance to win this game outright.

Reasons:

  1. Saints run D is weak at best. They rely on turnovers (Jake and special teams this is you)

  2. We have always played the Saints well. We know them and have been able to keep Brees in check (not including the 2nd half of the last years regular season finale in which prevent was implemented at halftime)

  3. Saints are due for a loss. Does anyone know our record in domes???? Would love to see that.

Cant wait for Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our run D might be not be strong again in this game if Clancy and Fujita (Ellis will be out for sure) are out, but we're still ranked 11th in the league. We gave up one long run to Ricky Williams in the Dolphin game (gave up 27 yards on 14 wildcat plays in that game). And yes, Turner gashed us, but I wouldn't call our run D weak. Carolina? They're 24th going against the run vs. the No. 4 rushing attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our run D might be not be strong again in this game if Clancy and Fujita (Ellis will be out for sure) are out, but we're still ranked 11th in the league. We gave up one long run to Ricky Williams in the Dolphin game (gave up 27 yards on 14 wildcat plays in that game). And yes, Turner gashed us, but I wouldn't call our run D weak. Carolina? They're 24th going against the run vs. the No. 4 rushing attack.

Going into last week the Cardinals had the #1 rushing defense. We did OK I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We play much better ageist teams that throw the ball and make big plays then we do ageist teams that dink and dunk and run the ball. Our whole D is set up to stop big plays.

Likewise our Offense is set up to run and use play action to set up big plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...