Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: Panthers Interested in Acquiring Haason Reddick


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

He has a $4.2 cap hit this year so the smart play would be to be patient wait until the Cardinals cut him before or after training camp. 

If they trade for him he will most likely restructure for Rhule. I cant see us giving up more than a 5th or 6th for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Not an invalid point but the history of college coaches doing the same has not been as kind. In fairness, Rhule seems to be a lot less invested in his old players than say, Chip Kelly or Steve Spurrier were.

True, but history, in this regard, gives us nothing more than an educated guess. A guess at which we chose to be positive or negative. As for me, I chose to be positive until I see a reason not to be. This isn't going to be an easy process by any means. We must take the good with the bad. Rhule is labeled as a teacher and builder. Let's give him the chance to teach our players his system and build our program...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurry up and trade our 1st round pick next year that we’re going to lose bc of Sean Payton for Reddick now. Just kidding but do hurry up and get it done. I’m tired of seeing rumors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

He has a $4.2 cap hit this year so the smart play would be to be patient wait until the Cardinals cut him before or after training camp. 

 

5 hours ago, Drk89Wng said:

If they trade for him he will most likely restructure for Rhule. I cant see us giving up more than a 5th or 6th for him.

There seems to be a lot of confusion about Redick's contract. He has a fully guaranteed rookie contract. He won't be cut because Arizona wouldn't save a dime in that scenario. If they trade him, the team acquiring him is responsible for his guaranteed base salary and Arizona only has to account for the prorated portion of his signing bonus. So he'll either play out his rookie contract in Arizona or be traded. That's it. If he's not in their plans at all, it really incentivizes them to accept any trade they can get in order to save some money. If his contract was more onerous, that would be a situation where we could even extract draft capital from them but since its essentially $2 million for a former 1st round pick, offering a late round pick is reasonable.

There's no room to restructure/alter his rookie contract, not only because its fully guaranteed but also because he's in the last year. Restructuring typically involves converting salary into signing bonus to spread out the contract cap hit over multiple years. You can't do that in the final year since there are no future years to spread it out to. If the money was not guaranteed, he could accept a pay cut on his base salary with incentive pay, similar to what Watkins did for KC, but since it is guaranteed, that's not an option either. We could sign him to an extension to save money in 2020, but that doesn't seem wise without seeing how he fits in our scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/2001828/haason-reddick?fbclid=IwAR0GmD0ntAphIS9t1RmzpLXEEhobrBYXGHCVVfRmJ2VRnWIi68RxOZTB384

The Cardinals will not pick up Reddick's fifth-year option, Jeremy Fowler of ESPN.com reports.

Reddick hasn't lived up to his draft capital as the No. 13 overall pick of the 2017 NFL Draft over the last three seasons in Arizona, and in 2019 he ultimately fell out of favor as a starter after Week 6.

The decision to pass on Reddick's fifth-year option sets him up to become a free agent in 2021, at which point the 25-year-old's demand on the open market will in large part come down to whether he's able to produce in 2020.

To Reddick's credit he hasn't yet missed a single game due to injury, but he's also never surpassed 80 tackles or four sacks in a single season. Still, his $4.3 million salary should secure him at least a rotational role in the Cardinals' linebacker corps for 2020.

Reddick posted 76 tackles (43 solo), six pass defenses, one sack and one fumble recovery in 16 contests during the 2019 campaign.

Reddick's final stat line is deceiving, as he didn't start after Week 6 and played more than 50 percent of the defensive snaps in just three of the final 10 games.

After losing his spot at inside linebacker to Joe Walker, Reddick eventually made the switch to the edge and recorded a measly nine tackles over the last six outings. Because Reddick has a cap hit of $4.3 million in 2020 -- all of which would be dead money in the event he's cut loose -- it behooves the Cardinals to find a role for him in which to thrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

He is on his rookie deal. He won't be restructuring.

Restructuring can go multiple ways, my intention was to insinuate a possible extension adding an extra year to stretch out the hit since it’s close to their budget already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Peon Awesome said:

 

There seems to be a lot of confusion about Redick's contract. He has a fully guaranteed rookie contract. He won't be cut because Arizona wouldn't save a dime in that scenario. If they trade him, the team acquiring him is responsible for his guaranteed base salary and Arizona only has to account for the prorated portion of his signing bonus. So he'll either play out his rookie contract in Arizona or be traded. That's it. If he's not in their plans at all, it really incentivizes them to accept any trade they can get in order to save some money. If his contract was more onerous, that would be a situation where we could even extract draft capital from them but since its essentially $2 million for a former 1st round pick, offering a late round pick is reasonable.

There's no room to restructure/alter his rookie contract, not only because its fully guaranteed but also because he's in the last year. Restructuring typically involves converting salary into signing bonus to spread out the contract cap hit over multiple years. You can't do that in the final year since there are no future years to spread it out to. If the money was not guaranteed, he could accept a pay cut on his base salary with incentive pay, similar to what Watkins did for KC, but since it is guaranteed, that's not an option either. We could sign him to an extension to save money in 2020, but that doesn't seem wise without seeing how he fits in our scheme.

You have way too much time on your hands to be this concerned to try to correct ideas in concern with something that hasn’t even happened. My thoughts of a restructuring were contingent on the amount left on the cap after rookie deals if it were to happen. An extension would’ve been a better wording but I chose extension because they’d be moving money from this year to next and adding some incentives to balance out to make it worth while to him if we went that route. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Drk89Wng said:

Restructuring can go multiple ways, my intention was to insinuate a possible extension adding an extra year to stretch out the hit since it’s close to their budget already. 

You can't stretch out the hit. It is a rookie deal. That money is owed really regardless of the scenario. He will get paid what he is due next season, unless Arizona cuts him. Any trade scenario will be us paying him his fully guaranteed salary.

Any extension will either be a fifth year option(at a high price) or an actual contract extension which would still not impact the money he makes next season other than paying him more in terms of a signing bonus. 

I don't personally want to see us extend him without him playing here. We haven't committed to many of these signings and I think that is wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...