Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When was the last time this team actually tried to score before the half?


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

What a fuging breath of fresh air. How many times did Ron Rivera kneel out the first half with all 3 timeout remaining? This team had the lead and still decided to drive down the field and get a touchdown. That was unheard of in the past decade of Panthers football.

May have been my favorite part of the entire game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

It may have been a first in franchise history lol. Was great to see!

I started to have flashbacks of Rivera standing there with all 3 timeouts watching the offense run it up the gut 3 times in a row. 

I can't remember the year but it was at home against the saints. We run it 3 times and punted it back with all 3 timeouts left and the Saints got it back with like 40 seconds and drove down and got a FG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

I started to have flashbacks of Rivera standing there with all 3 timeouts watching the offense run it up the gut 3 times in a row. 

I can't remember the year but it was at home against the saints. We run it 3 times and punted it back with all 3 timeouts left and the Saints got it back with like 40 seconds and drove down and got a FG.

Rivera really was the worst

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...