Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More NFL Covid nonsense. Players must now isolate for 5 days even if they test negative if they had “high risk” contact

PanthersNC1984

By PanthersNC1984,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PanthersNC1984 Newbie

PanthersNC1984

Posted
Posted

So first we isolate players who “tested positive” but feel completely fine (Cam Newton) but that’s not enough, so now it doesn’t matter if you have it or not, you must isolate if you came in “high risk” contact with a positive player. In other words, just another virtue signaling Covid measure to just try and make a statement that you take it seriously but it actually doesn’t do anything. Kind of like people who wear masks outside when they are all alone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigdog10 Experienced

bigdog10

Posted
Posted

Can’t fault the NFL. The titans forced their hand to tighten their measures. 
 

Too much money involved to have players going rogue. 
 

With that said, we will see how strict this policy is when Mahomes, Wilson, or Rodgers is required for five days of isolation Three days before a big game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersNC1984 Newbie

PanthersNC1984

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, bigdog10 said:

Can’t fault the NFL. The titans forced their hand to tighten their measures. 
 

Too much money involved to have players going rogue. 
 

With that said, we will see how strict this policy is when Mahomes, Wilson, or Rodgers is required for five days of isolation Three days before a big game. 

Yes, speaking of the Titans. They all get Covid, two weeks later they come back and blow out a very good 3-0 Bills team like they were a high school team. Wasn’t Covid like super dangerous? Hmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, PanthersNC1984 said:

Yes, speaking of the Titans. They all get Covid, two weeks later they come back and blow out a very good 3-0 Bills team like they were a high school team. Wasn’t Covid like super dangerous? Hmmm

It’s killed 210k+ here in the US. So far. Yes it can be dangerous. And no,  not every titan got covid. The ones that had it didn’t play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paintballr Newbie

Paintballr

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PanthersNC1984 said:

Yes, speaking of the Titans. They all get Covid, two weeks later they come back and blow out a very good 3-0 Bills team like they were a high school team. Wasn’t Covid like super dangerous? Hmmm

Really hope you aren’t trying to simplify and downplay a virus that has killed over 210,000 people, more then 9/11, more then Vietnam

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, Paintballr said:

Really hope you aren’t trying to simplify and downplay a virus that has killed over 210,000 people, more then 9/11, more then Vietnam

It 100% is what he is trying to do. It should be in the Tinderbox though. Not here in the main section. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Week 6 PFF grades vs. DAL

      By TD alt · Posted

      I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • csx
      Mitchell Evans

      By csx · Posted

      Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
    • Basbear
      Can we get to 9-8?

      By Basbear · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...