Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox = Tressel


Guest DrewBreesIsGod

Recommended Posts

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

:iagree:

Couldn't agree mor with this comparison...so true!

However, lack of execution (drops by Smith and Jarrett on potentially big plays to name a few), settling for FGs (unsuccessful drives into the red zone after the Gamble INT in the 2nd quarter and again after the 10 minute drive in the 3rd), along with some questionable playcalling down the stretch was our undoing yesterday. We score TDs on those two drives and the outcome is different IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That fumble by 34 is what killed us, not coaching!

We wouldn't have been in that position if the offense scored on those two drives - the Gamble INT in the 2nd and clock-eating drive after the Saints scored in the 3rd were momentum changes that we should have capitalized on. We score 6 on each of those drives, instead of settling for FGs, and the outcome of the game would've been much different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That fumble by 34 is what killed us, not coaching!

Bullshit "play not to lose" calling is what killed us.

We started sitting on our lead in the second quarter, which is f**king gutless and pathetic. Stupid, too, considering who we were playing.

I mean, who could've POSSIBLY imagined the Saints could score 20+ in one half of football. Unpossible!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

Agreed.

We're calling plays to hide Jake and you just can't do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

I could give two sh*ts about your opinion.

Damn Saints have one good half of a season and you morons are football gods all of a sudden? Screw off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could give two sh*ts about your opinion.

Damn Saints have one good half of a season and you morons are football gods all of a sudden? Screw off.

nice job attacking someone for saying something that is 100% true.

and unless there is a hidden message that says that the saints are 19-0, he wasn't even saying the saints are "gods" (unless you're refering to the username)

honestly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

I could give two sh*ts about your opinion.

Damn Saints have one good half of a season and you morons are football gods all of a sudden? Screw off.

expect nothing less from you my man...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bullshit "play not to lose" calling is what killed us.

We started sitting on our lead in the second quarter, which is f**king gutless and pathetic. Stupid, too, considering who we were playing.

I mean, who could've POSSIBLY imagined the Saints could score 20+ in one half of football. Unpossible!

you mean in a quarter. Saints have put up 21 pts in one quarter many times. DC should have known that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...