Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox = Tressel


Guest DrewBreesIsGod

Recommended Posts

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

:iagree:

Couldn't agree mor with this comparison...so true!

However, lack of execution (drops by Smith and Jarrett on potentially big plays to name a few), settling for FGs (unsuccessful drives into the red zone after the Gamble INT in the 2nd quarter and again after the 10 minute drive in the 3rd), along with some questionable playcalling down the stretch was our undoing yesterday. We score TDs on those two drives and the outcome is different IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That fumble by 34 is what killed us, not coaching!

We wouldn't have been in that position if the offense scored on those two drives - the Gamble INT in the 2nd and clock-eating drive after the Saints scored in the 3rd were momentum changes that we should have capitalized on. We score 6 on each of those drives, instead of settling for FGs, and the outcome of the game would've been much different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That fumble by 34 is what killed us, not coaching!

Bullshit "play not to lose" calling is what killed us.

We started sitting on our lead in the second quarter, which is f**king gutless and pathetic. Stupid, too, considering who we were playing.

I mean, who could've POSSIBLY imagined the Saints could score 20+ in one half of football. Unpossible!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

Agreed.

We're calling plays to hide Jake and you just can't do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see you guys hammering Jake, Smith, Peppers...etc. Bottom line is you have a coach that coaches EXACTLY like that coach at Ohio St. Fox coaches 'not to lose'. The moment he starts coaching to win, you will explode.

That's all I have to say about that....

I could give two sh*ts about your opinion.

Damn Saints have one good half of a season and you morons are football gods all of a sudden? Screw off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could give two sh*ts about your opinion.

Damn Saints have one good half of a season and you morons are football gods all of a sudden? Screw off.

nice job attacking someone for saying something that is 100% true.

and unless there is a hidden message that says that the saints are 19-0, he wasn't even saying the saints are "gods" (unless you're refering to the username)

honestly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

I could give two sh*ts about your opinion.

Damn Saints have one good half of a season and you morons are football gods all of a sudden? Screw off.

expect nothing less from you my man...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bullshit "play not to lose" calling is what killed us.

We started sitting on our lead in the second quarter, which is f**king gutless and pathetic. Stupid, too, considering who we were playing.

I mean, who could've POSSIBLY imagined the Saints could score 20+ in one half of football. Unpossible!

you mean in a quarter. Saints have put up 21 pts in one quarter many times. DC should have known that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...