Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where is Kyle Trask ranked in this year's draft? He's looked good tonight.


SCO96

Recommended Posts

I haven't watched much college football this year. Tonight is the first time I've seen Kyle Trask play. Check out his stat line 26-40 3TDs with no INTs. He helped the Gators put up 46 points on Alabama tonight in a hard fought game they could have won had the defense just played a little bit better in the first half (they have up 35 points) We all know Trevor is going #1. But how are the other QBs ranked?

Justin Fields was considered the #2 at the start of the season. But I think you could make a strong case for Mac Jones and/or Kyle Trask now. Based on tonight's performance I wouldn't be disappointed at all if we grabbed Trask, which could happen since we're picking inside the top 10 this year. I'm sure most of you on this board have followed him more than me. Do you think he's legit?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Varking said:

He’s late first or early second. Jones and Trask should not leapfrog Fields to be the second QB off the board. 

I haven't seen Fields play at all this season so I can't give any assessment on him.  I assume he'd be the 2nd QB off the board (prior to our pick). If he's gone before  we are on the clock could you see us taking Trask?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SCO96 said:

I haven't seen Fields play at all this season so I can't give any assessment on him this.  I assume he'd be the 2nd QB off the board (prior to our pick). If he's gone before  we are on the clock could you see us taking Trask?

 

Not at our current slot of 4. I could see us trading back into the end of the first to get him or taking him if he is still available in the second. The issue people have with him is that he lacks elite velocity. His arm is just average. He also cant run like Lawrence, Fields, Lance or Wilson. People believe to be a high pick you have to be elite in something. I think Trask is the best QB in college football this season but he has limiting factors. You also can’t just think he will have NFL success because of his college success but if he goes to a team like the Steelers he’s in a really good position to succeed at the next level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

I haven't seen Fields play at all this season so I can't give any assessment on him.  I assume he'd be the 2nd QB off the board (prior to our pick). If he's gone before  we are on the clock could you see us taking Trask?

 

If we take Trask over Wilson my head will explode. After watching Fields today I’m tempted to say Wilson should be QB2 and we need to root for the Jags to take Fields at 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

If we take Trask over Wilson my head will explode. After watching Fields today I’m tempted to say Wilson should be QB2 and we need to root for the Jags to take Fields at 2

I know it's wrong to stereotype people, but I'm leary of drafting ANY Ohio State QB high in the draft. I've been watching pro football since the late 70's, and I can't recall any QB from that school excelling in the NFL. As a GM, I'd trade down and pick up extra picks before I'd draft Fields.

 

Ok, I'm ready for you guys to go off on me now :fear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

I know it's wrong to stereotype people, but I'm leary of drafting ANY Ohio State QB high in the draft. I've been watching pro football since the late 70's, and I can't recall any QB from that school excelling in the NFL. As a GM, I'd trade down and pick up extra picks before I'd draft Fields.

 

Ok, I'm ready for you guys to go off on me now :fear:

That’s what I’m saying. I’m almost glad we’re at 4 instead of 2 (assuming it holds) because I think we get the better QB in Wilson 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What scares people about Ohio State quarterbacks is the same thing that scares them about Alabama quarterbacks. It's the question of "Sre they really that good, or are they just playing on a team that's head and shoulders above everyone else?"

Troy Smith probably didn't do Ohio State any favors on that front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

That’s what I’m saying. I’m almost glad we’re at 4 instead of 2 (assuming it holds) because I think we get the better QB in Wilson 

I'm so out of the loop this season (hectic life, Covid-19, etc) that I don't even know who "Wilson" is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SCO96 said:

I'm so out of the loop this season (hectic life, Covid-19, etc) that I don't even know who "Wilson" is. 

Jordan Love but less physically gifted. Strong arm, but not as strong as Love. Good legs but not as fast as Love. Neither one plays great competition so it’s hard to project. A team like the Packers could afford a pick like that because he can sit for years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm of the thought that if you aren't comfortable drafting a guy at 4 but feel better drafting him later in the 1st or early 2nd, especially at QB, then you don't take that guy at all.  If you feel he's your guy, you would take him as early as you can, and if you're not sure he's that guy, you just don't take him.  Guys like Trask, Wilson, and Jones seem like those type of guys to me, which is what makes me rather avoid them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...