Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitchell Trubisky.. please no


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He isn't anywhere near the caliber of Stafford and he isn't as good as Goff. He might have a high ceiling but he is one of the streakiest QB's in the NFL. I wouldn't take him over any of the top 4 QB's in this draft either. 

I will gladly take him on a one year veteran minimum deal, however. 

Problem is that the top 4 QB off the board are likely gone by 8. Leaving us to sell the home for Watson which most reasonable folks would not do or signing a guy like Trubisky who at the right price could bring a low risk high reward option for the “rebuild process.” If they don’t think Teddy is their guy anymore they’ll likely have to pull the trigger on somebody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarHeel said:

Problem is that the top 4 QB off the board are likely gone by 8. Leaving us to sell the home for Watson which most reasonable folks would not do or signing a guy like Trubisky who at the right price could bring a low risk high reward option for the “rebuild process.” If they don’t think Teddy is their guy anymore they’ll likely have to pull the trigger on somebody.

That isn't the thing I was responding to, though. It was the fact that you thought he is better than those guys. He isn't even close to the level of Stafford or Goff. He is certainly not worth more than any of the top 4 QB's in this draft. 

I am 100% fine with Trubisky on a very cheap 1 year. Definitely want no part of him on anything more than a 1 year cheap deal, however.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He isn't anywhere near the caliber of Stafford and he isn't as good as Goff. He might have a high ceiling but he is one of the streakiest QB's in the NFL. I wouldn't take him over any of the top 4 QB's in this draft either. 

I will gladly take him on a one year veteran minimum deal, however. 

I never said he was better than Stafford. I agreed that I would take him over Stafford because he is still significantly younger and his ceiling hasn’t been reached in my opinion. Plus he would not bring the same ridiculous price tag allowing us to actually rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I never said he was better than Stafford. I agreed that I would take him over Stafford because he is still significantly younger and his ceiling hasn’t been reached in my opinion. Plus he would not bring the same ridiculous price tag allowing us to actually rebuild.

Yeah but he also isn't going to be our franchise QB, either. He's just an upgrade over Walker and Grier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah but he also isn't going to be our franchise QB, either. He's just an upgrade over Walker and Grier. 

I’d like to see what he can do with our offense. He hasn’t touched the talent Teddy had last year since he’s been drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah and he probably will not. But, we did try to take a flier on Haskins, so you never know. 

That’s true. I figured the new crew wouldn’t have even brought him in but they surprised me. You’re probably right but stranger things have happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

That’s true. I figured the new crew wouldn’t have even brought him in but they surprised me. You’re probably right but stranger things have happened.

I think we are seeing how desperate they are to move beyond Teddy. 

At some level, that does give me hope. Rivera would have stuck it out for 4-5 seasons to find out how it worked out.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So happy that LaMelo got the layup to go and *won* the game. How happy he was after the game, that's what a young dude like him needs to keep it going and keep the belief going. If we lose, LaMelo gets blamed, and he's got an offseason to be in his head and hear the noise like the last few years. The season might still have an ugly ending, but weirdly feels like last night was HUGE for this team moving forward.   
    • My thoughts on Carolina's post-season run: Obviously, the season began with a below average Freddie Andersen and everyone hoping Kochetkov would pick up the slack, until he got hurt. Enter Brandon Bussi who had a made-for-TV movie type run until the end of the season, when he came crashing back to earth, his save % drops under .900 and the team needs to score 5-6 goals to win games. Freddie has shown signs of a resurgence and Bussi looked pretty good the last 2 games of the season, but both sample sizes are small and questions abound for all 3 goalies. The physicality of playoff hockey will take its toll. Save for a few players, the Canes best players are small, their top 2 lines are small and there's no getting around that. The only way to protect the size disadvantage is a strong forecheck. Allowing opposing teams to establish the offensive zone and create board battles with smaller players will hurt Carolina. The Stankoven line could be a difference-maker. If they continue to play well against lower defensive pairs, it only adds to the depth of the team.  The Aho line had stretches of absenteeism during the season. The Canes cannot afford to have them dry up offensively and leave the scoring to Ehlers and the Stankoven line. If they aren't performing well, teams will simply roll their best lines out on the Canes best playing lines.  If the Canes can get by Ottawa and get some help from Boston against Buffalo, I think they have a legit shot to make the finals. Make no mistake, I think their toughest challenges are Ottawa and Buffalo in the East. 
×
×
  • Create New...