Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Extra Year of NCAA Eligibility Make 2022 Draft Picks More Valuable?


CanadianCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Been thinking about this for some time.. 

With players being able to get an year in College, does that make NEXT years draft contain more quality players? 

Obviously there are clear cut guys in the 1st and 2nd rounds but from 3rd round on, would those players typically be of higher value than what we would see this year? Thinking specifically of linemen, they get an extra year to get bigger and stronger. There would be less projections from teams perspectives. 

If so, then would it make sense making deals this year to secure more picks next year?

What do you college guru's think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It is complicated to determine the value of a player. As was said above, sometimes the round doesn't matter at all. The main thing is the skill of the player. Often, young people have less success than those who are older because they only have less experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, fairy12345 said:

It is complicated to determine the value of a player. As was said above, sometimes the round doesn't matter at all. The main thing is the skill of the player. Often, young people have less success than those who are older because they only have less experience.

YES!! Often people are mistaken in this. It seems to them that the younger, the stronger. But this is not true. It is the experience and the ability to assess the important situation and not the strength. And it takes years to do this.
Some people make mistakes when they place bets because of this, especially in basketball. Therefore, it is important to know what you are doing. Some people watch NBA Computer Picks to avoid this, but you still need to be very careful.
We will see what happens next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...