Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Fact of the matter is the league is filled with stories of players making a move and improving.  Google it yourself.   You will probably rule out the stories for some stupid reason or another...he played too long, he wasn't AS bad...it was another team besides the jets...he wasn't top 3... he had different hair color...

IT. DOESN'T.  MATTER.  The dataset is to small and unique to make inferences.   

The jets sucked.  It wasn't all Darnold.  This fall we will find out how much.

That you Billy Mumphrey?

😉😂

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I mean Alex Smith looked like crap his first three years. He really didn’t take off until Harbaugh became the coach and then again with Andy Reid and the Chiefs. The right staff and system can do wonders for a QB. Troy Aikman and Brett Favre had shitty years they’re first 3 as well. The fact is Darnold is only been in the league 3 years, we little help, and terrible coaching. He is still a big question mark at this point who has bad habits of trying to make something out of nothing (like Favre early in his career). 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I mean Alex Smith looked like crap his first three years.

Troy Aikman and Brett Favre had shitty years they’re first 3 as well.

Favre was 26-19 his first 3 seasons...a far cry from "not good" and "only failed".  

Neither Smith nor Aikman was given up on and cast aside such that they had to go play somewhere else...

...still looking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Favre was 26-19 his first 3 seasons...a far cry from "not good" and "only failed".  

Neither Smith nor Aikman was given up on and cast aside such that they had to go play somewhere else...

...still looking. 

Favre only played in 33 games his first 3 seasons so let’s check your math. Sat most of his rookie year and only played in 2 games with barely any snaps. His third season he has 19 TDs and 24 INTs with a 60% completion and 72 rating (I’ll be damned the same rating as Darnold in year 3).
Like I was saying these players struggled their first 3 years, the Jets brought in a new staff and wanted to get a new face at 2, so they traded Darnold for draft capital. Let’s be honest the Jets haven’t been the best decision makers lately.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/112/brett-favre

There you go buddy you can read it there without trying to correct people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Favre was 26-19 his first 3 seasons...a far cry from "not good" and "only failed".  

Neither Smith nor Aikman was given up on and cast aside such that they had to go play somewhere else...

...still looking. 

Smith's first year he threw 1 TD and 9 Interceptions in 9 games.  Darnold never came close to that level of suck.

Smith's second year he was 16td 16 ints.  Smiths 3rd year, only the Jets' Kellen Clemens had a poorer passer rating than Smiths 57.2.  Over 3 years he was worse than Darnold.

Smith sucked.  The 9ers kept him.  If he was on the jets, they would have traded him.

Please explain why its crucial that the franchise be so moronic to trade away the 1st round picks every couple years for it to be a valid example of a combeback quarterback.

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Smith's first year he threw 1 TD and 9 Interceptions in 9 games.  Darnold never came close to that level of suck.

Smith's second year he was 16td 16 ints.  Smiths 3rd year, only the Jets' Kellen Clemens had a poorer passer rating than Smiths 57.2.  Over 3 years he was worse than Darnold.

Smith sucked.  The 9ers kept him.  If he was on the jets, they would have traded him.

Please explain why its crucial that the franchise be so moronic to trade away the 1st round picks every couple years for it to be a valid example of a combeback quarterback.

 

He has to be a troll from another fan page. Every now and then he will post something half decent to make me question it, but I’m certain he is a bitter Falcons fan or something like that...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Smith's first year he threw 1 TD and 9 Interceptions in 9 games.  Darnold never came close to that level of suck.

Smith's second year he was 16td 16 ints.  Smiths 3rd year, only the Jets' Kellen Clemens had a poorer passer rating than Smiths 57.2.  Over 3 years he was worse than Darnold.

Smith sucked.  The 9ers kept him.  If he was on the jets, they would have traded him.

Please explain why its crucial that the franchise be so moronic to trade away the 1st round picks every couple years for it to be a valid example of a combeback quarterback.

 

Teddy looks awesome by comparison...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Favre only played in 33 games his first 3 seasons so let’s check your math. Sat most of his rookie year and only played in 2 games with barely any snaps. His third season he has 19 TDs and 24 INTs with a 60% completion and 72 rating (I’ll be damned the same rating as Darnold in year 3).
Like I was saying these players struggled their first 3 years, the Jets brought in a new staff and wanted to get a new face at 2, so they traded Darnold for draft capital. Let’s be honest the Jets haven’t been the best decision makers lately.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/112/brett-favre

There you go buddy you can read it there without trying to correct people.

Favre didn't play year-1...

...started 45 games next 3 years...went 26-19  

Starts are what counts. 

 

356E8B75-5C19-43A5-B84B-9A2D85729ACE.png

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Favre didn't play year-1...

...started 45 games next 3 years...went 26-19  356E8B75-5C19-43A5-B84B-9A2D85729ACE.thumb.png.3fa869b1d8c5fae822d4ab80c995cd62.png

Starts are what counts. 

 He had the luxury of sitting a year and still played just as bad his first 2. First 3 years is what I posted, sorry your comprehension was off, but that doesn’t change the data I provided. Darnold has been injured and missed 10 games over the past 3 years. That’s over half a season. I’m just looking at where these players are at by the end of year 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

 He had the luxury of sitting a year and still played just as bad his first 2. 

Darnold has been injured and missed 10 games over the past 3 years. That’s over half a season. 

Brett began his career with 3 straight winning seasons as a starting QB...there is nothing "bad" about that. 

Is Sam injury prone?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Brett began his career with 3 straight winning seasons as a starting QB...there is nothing "bad" about that. 

Is Sam injury prone?

Everyone is prone to injury behind the jets oline.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quickbooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 a free application provided by Intuit, designed to diagnose and fix various QuickBooks errors with ease. With a comprehensive set of tools, the Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 simplifies the troubleshooting process and saves you valuable time. So why should you choose the QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438? Here are some key benefits: If you don't know how to use the QuickBooks Tool Hub, after following this article on How to Download QuickBooks Tool Hub please see the detailed article on How to Use QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438. Please feel free to comment and subscribe to our posts for free tutorials like this. Benefits of Using QuickBooks Tool Hub? Saves time: The QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 saves time by providing a one-stop-shop for fixing various QuickBooks errors like QuickBooks Error H202, QuickBooks Error H505, QuickBooks Unrecoverable Error , QuickBooks Error 1904, QuickBooks Error 1328, QuickBooks Data Recovery etc. You don't need to search for different tools or methods to fix the error. Just download the tool using the  QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 Download Link below. Easy to use: The QuickBooks Tool Hub is easy to use, even for non-technical users. The on-screen instructions are clear and straightforward, making it easy to diagnose and fix QuickBooks errors. Comprehensive: From network issues to installation problems, the Tool Hub covers it all. No more jumping between different applications or support forums.  
    • Ehh NYR had more scoring opportunities and Florida is healthy with an elite net minder. Only fault I have on Rod is his goalie decision. At some point, the players deserve some balme. 
    • I went to McDonald's at lunch got a combo for $12. It was ok. The next day I ordered lunch from Cracker Barrel got the broccoli cheddar chicken, steak fries, and 2 biscuits paid $12 with tip. Guess which was better. 
×
×
  • Create New...