Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your NFC guide to the rest of the NFL season..(updated weekly)


Samuel L. Jackson

Recommended Posts

As of right now, the NFC standings are as follows:

Saints 9--0

Vikings 8--1

Cowboys 6--3

Cardinals 6--3

Eagles 5--4

Falcons 5--4

Packers 5--4

Giants 5--4

49ers 4--5

Panthers 4--5

Bears 4--5

Redskins 3--6

Seahawks 3--6

Here's who you should root for next week...

Week11

TB over NO, SEA over MIN, WAS over DAL, STL over ARI, CHI over PHI, ATL over NYG, SF over GB, CAR over MIA

I'll update this thread each week thereafter, with a "who to root for this week" list...

Basically, this thread will size up the playoff picture as long as the Panthers remain in it...

As of right now, I think the Panthers (if they keep improving in all areas of the game) have a shot at 9-7 or, even better, 10-6...

IF we go 10-6, I think we have a shot at sneaking into the last wildcard slot, as I see the end of season records (looking at teams' opponents each week) looking like:

Saints 14--2

Vikings 12--4

Cardinals 10--6

Eagles 9--7

Packers 10--6*

Panthers 10--6

Cowboys 9--7

Falcons 9--7

Giants 9--7

49ers 9--7

Bears 6--10

Redskins 5--11

Seahawks 5--11

* I see the Packers going 9-3 in the conference, and us 8-4 (long shot, but doable)... This would give them the tiebreaker in a wildcard race with us...

I'm being overly optimistic with this whole thread idea, but it's something to keep me interested... We should honestly take things one game at a time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's who you should root for next week...

Week11

TB over NO, SEA over MIN, WAS over DAL, STL over ARI, CHI over PHI, ATL over NYG, SF over GB, CAR over MIA

here's what it would look like if that happened.

Saints 9--1

Vikings 8--2

Cowboys 6--4

Cardinals 6--4

Eagles 5--5

Falcons 6--4

Packers 5--5

Giants 5--5

49ers 5--5

Panthers 5--5

Bears 5--5

Redskins 4--6

Seahawks 4--6

i am going to be pulling for the giants over the falcons. i can't see the sense in not. we aren't really in contention for the division champs at this point but still...i think that pulling for the giants makes more sense.

everything else looks good, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two questions:

Dont we want Dallas out right to win? That way they securely lock up the East. And let philly and Giants fend for the wildcard battle. I would think we wouldnt want the NFC East to be all muddled up come playoff time.

Also wouldnt we be wanting ultimatley the Cardinals to drop to wildcard and have the 49ers win the divison? That way,if are records are the same, we have a direct head to head win over Arizona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predict that no NFCS team gets a wildcard.

This is the playoff bracket IMO:

South - NO (1 seed)

North - Minn (2 seed)

East - Dal (3 seed)

West - Arizona (4 seed)

Wildcard:

Eagles (They get the Bears, Falcons, 49ers, and Broncos so if they can beat either the Giants or the Cowboys then they are going to go 10-6 IMO.)

Packers (They have 5 more games that are really winnable against the 49ers, Lions, Bears, Seahawks, and Cardinals).

So far for us I see 3 more "winnable" games. Not only that, but we are a game behind both the Packers and the Eagles. The last 4 games of our schedule are just way too brutal and giving up a game in the process (being 4-5 instead of 5-4) is just too much to overcome.

If we hadn't folded against the Bills and not dug ourselves such a deep hole at 0-3 to start the season then I'd say we were a wildcard team. But the reality is that the schedule just isn't going to play out for us.

Maybe the organization will learn from this. They need to realize that you can't have a QB that is going to lose games for you or else you will dig 0-3 holes where you can't recover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...