Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers' three-year salary cap forecast looks strong


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/10/2021 at 1:44 PM, ForJimmy said:

Wait, you mean CMC’s contract didn’t ruin our cap and prevent us from signing any linemen?? I need to verify this with my source….

Why do you think we drafted Chuba? Fitters knows RBs don't last long in this league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

He was the 126th pick. I assume he is there to take some carries and be a solid backup?

Thats what most people think but he is a work horse back and you dont pick RB at 13 anymore unless your name is marty hurney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2021 at 4:17 PM, Snake said:

Thats what most people think but he is a work horse back and you dont pick RB at 13 anymore unless your name is marty hurney.

I think we are going to see Chuba used more than our previous backups to CMC.

As for drafting CMC too high, I agree, but damn I'm glad he's on our team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SBBlue said:

I think we are going to see Chuba used more than our previous backups to CMC.

As for drafting CMC too high, I agree, but damn I'm glad he's on our team.

CMC IMO wasn't simply because he's a great WR that can run the rock. He's simply a imposing player on the field. With that said pretty much any other RB isn't worth it in this NFL. Case and point Saquon Barkley. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...