Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we still host the NFCCG?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

irony:

  • A perception of inconsistency, [usually but not always humorous], in which an apparently straightforward statement or event is undermined by its context so as to give it a very different significance
  • Verbal irony. . . involves a discrepancy between what is said and what is really meant.
  • Structural irony. . . involves the use of a naive or deluded hero or unreliable narrator whose view of the world differs widely from the true circumstances recognized by the author and readers.
  • In dramatic irony. . . the audience knows more about a character's situation than a character does foreseeing an outcome contrary to a character's expectations, and thus ascribing a sharply different sense to the character's own statements.

(Chris Baldick, The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (Oxford UP, 1990)) :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

irony:

  • A perception of inconsistency, [usually but not always humorous], in which an apparently straightforward statement or event is undermined by its context so as to give it a very different significance
  • Verbal irony. . . involves a discrepancy between what is said and what is really meant.
  • Structural irony. . . involves the use of a naive or deluded hero or unreliable narrator whose view of the world differs widely from the true circumstances recognized by the author and readers.
  • In dramatic irony. . . the audience knows more about a character's situation than a character does foreseeing an outcome contrary to a character's expectations, and thus ascribing a sharply different sense to the character's own statements.

(Chris Baldick, The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (Oxford UP, 1990)) :thumbsup:

Oxford my foot! You got that from wikipedia. You can't even spell oxford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the definitions of irony is "an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected."

Or even: "a state of affairs that appears perversely contrary to what one expects."

So, for the grammatical kings, they aren't really all that wrong. Even if the original definition (from who knows when [well, the dictionary usually knows when the word originated, but they don't date definitions]) differs from how it is being used now, that does not make them incorrect.

The definitions and meanings of words change as they are used. Thus, if a word is misused for a long period, it eventually becomes correct.

Just go through the dictionary and you will see how many archaic definitions there are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a thought, how about we just focus on now? Because if we lose this weekend, there won't be a home playoff game.

It's not about us; it's about the team.

We're going to cheer either way even if we are focused on the games down the road. We aren't a part of the team, only the fanbase. It's important for the team to focus on this weekend, not us.

No, that does not make the fanbase unimportant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not about us; it's about the team.

We're going to cheer either way even if we are focused on the games down the road. We aren't a part of the team, only the fanbase. It's important for the team to focus on this weekend, not us.

No, that does not make the fanbase unimportant.

Talking about hosting the NFC CG when we still have a legit shot at slipping to the 5 seed is a bit ridiculous though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking about hosting the NFC CG when we still have a legit shot at slipping to the 5 seed is a bit ridiculous though.

So we shouldn't make predictions at all? Gotcha.

Note: I do get your point, and agree that it's a bit ridiculous, but none-the-less it's decently fun to think about the possibility. This is especially true when it equates to the Giants losing a game. I don't like them at all now.

I'm not a sore loser at all... what gave you that impression... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a failing of most first time HCs. I get an OC not being a defensive expert but they do play the other side every week so it always amazes me that poop slides so often. First year? Sure but as time goes on they need to be a HC and have a balanced and good team in the end. They went offense for that reason and the QB issues the team had. They had to go WR again this year because they failed so hard last year at that position in the first. That's on both the HC and GM on that miss IMO. This year they went out and got a bunch of free agents and drafted more on the D. It just doesn't appear they did it well again. Add in keeping Evero and missing out on an expensive free agent, thankfully but it would have lessened the cap gap in spending, it's not like they didn't try. It's more of an issue of competency than cap. Building around Evero after last year is damning for thr GM and HC. That's the biggest issue. They just didn't do any of it well. Now they have some younger talent and I don't think there is a decent coach in that house.
    • Inside linebacker is basically non existent. And that goes against everything that has been Carolina Panthers for a couple decades now. And that is just one such area that has suffered as we have paid through the nose to build up our offense around a bad investment.
    • Thats why its going to suck spending another top 10 pick on a qb instead of an elite Lb, pass rusher or whatever.  but it what it is and you have to have a qb to win in this league
×
×
  • Create New...