Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 weeks in...let's look at QBs


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, davos said:

as many players and coaches say, there are certain intangibles guys either have or don't and they know the SECOND they step onto the practice field after they're drafted. 

As the OP notes, sometimes a player's talent is just immediately obvious.  From watching him in our game, I think Zach Wilson is one of those guys. 

Wilson has clear NFL arm strength as well as the moxie to bounce back from bad throws / tough defensive plays.  I thought in our game (where he got the crap knocked out of him) Wilson looked like the real deal.  He has the physical tools, the mental toughness and the team-leading charisma to become an NFL starter.

Now with Wilson's bad luck going to the Jets, a QB-killing organization, that potential might never be realized.   The whole team seems to be set up to extinguish any potential a player has.  It's really the dead zone for almost all young players (and has been that way for many years).  So there's a good chance his ceiling is never reached there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I watched the first half of the Broncos - Jets game today. Bridgewater is doing what he always does - keeps the offence ticking and in rhythm, but refuses to take the deep shots and is unable to move the ball quickly.

When Denver get behind in games he won't be the guy to bring them back. 

Copying from NBC’s player news service since unfortunately this isn’t a tweet or what have you

Bridgewater has 18 attempts of at least 20 yards, trailing only Derek Carr (22) and Lamar Jackson (19) headed into Week 3 Monday Night Football. Nearly 19 percent of Bridgewater's passes this season have been downfield shots -- a pleasant surprise for fantasy managers who hedged on Denver pass catchers with the conservative veteran under center. On Sunday against the Jets, Bridgewater completed three of five deep balls for 82 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, gruffmusic said:

Copying from NBC’s player news service since unfortunately this isn’t a tweet or what have you

Bridgewater has 18 attempts of at least 20 yards, trailing only Derek Carr (22) and Lamar Jackson (19) headed into Week 3 Monday Night Football. Nearly 19 percent of Bridgewater's passes this season have been downfield shots -- a pleasant surprise for fantasy managers who hedged on Denver pass catchers with the conservative veteran under center. On Sunday against the Jets, Bridgewater completed three of five deep balls for 82 yards.

 

Now that is surprising and it tells me one of two things :

1.) That the Jets Cornerbacks are downright horrid

or

2.) He purposely did not throw the ball deep as a Panther

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BlitzMonster said:

As the OP notes, sometimes a player's talent is just immediately obvious.  From watching him in our game, I think Zach Wilson is one of those guys. 

Wilson has clear NFL arm strength as well as the moxie to bounce back from bad throws / tough defensive plays.  I thought in our game (where he got the crap knocked out of him) Wilson looked like the real deal.  He has the physical tools, the mental toughness and the team-leading charisma to become an NFL starter.

Now with Wilson's bad luck going to the Jets, a QB-killing organization, that potential might never be realized.   The whole team seems to be set up to extinguish any potential a player has.  It's really the dead zone for almost all young players (and has been that way for many years).  So there's a good chance his ceiling is never reached there.  

In looking at this crop, I agree that Wilson has shown it the most.  Lawrence has had a few impressive, what I'll call the sequences of throws.  And Lance, I haven't seen enough of to know.  But the crop isn't pretty as a whole. Early, but their eye tests are up in the air but the class reminds me of Cam/Gabbert/Locker's year.

Fields and Mac, I'm not really seeing the field presence or feel but that's just my opinion.  And I was a BIG Fields proponent, especially after the last 2 college playoffs.  They don't seem to size up to the speed and feel and they look behind processing and being in the moment.  It can be very apparent but no doubt Fields has more time to showcase his skills, could've been a momentary thing.  But it was good timing to use their stats and size Sam up and hype this place up some. 

Darnold showed "it" in flashes (not consistently).  But would suddenly have games in NY when it was the case and he had damn nice balls and great drives.  In part why a lot of that fanbase, for how crazy they can be, did not give up on him yet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...