Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speaking of poor talent evaluation


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, hepcat said:

I guess Trai Turner is still a decent RG ranked 16 out of 39. Better than John Miller I’m sure. 940317F9-9745-4F40-B7AB-9032AFE535C3.thumb.jpeg.e0b10c3856245d5527bb02e253d34f78.jpeg

To be fair, we got the better end of that deal at first… Okung just prefers to dabble in crypto and stocks/bonds these days over grabbing grown men in their nether regions on Sunday and occasionally Monday and Thursday.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

To be fair, we got the better end of that deal at first… Okung just prefers to dabble in crypto and stocks/bonds these days over grabbing grown men in their nether regions on Sunday and occasionally Monday and Thursday.

No we didn’t. We traded a guy who was in the prime of his career for a guy at the end just bc the guy at the end was at a more important position…then he ended up mostly sucking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

To be fair, we got the better end of that deal at first… Okung just prefers to dabble in crypto and stocks/bonds these days over grabbing grown men in their nether regions on Sunday and occasionally Monday and Thursday.

I mean, did we?? Okung played in what, 7 games last year? Turner is still in the NFL and playing well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

No we didn’t. We traded a guy who was in the prime of his career for a guy at the end just bc the guy at the end was at a more important position…then he ended up mostly sucking. 

***Tell me you didn’t watch Chargers games last year without telling me you didn’t watch Chargers games last year***

Prime of his career my ass… only thing prime was the steak and ribs ol’ buddy was throwing down from the poo ton of money we paid him.

 

 

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

***Tell me you didn’t watch Chargers games last year without telling me you didn’t watch Chargers games last year***

Prime of his career my ass… only thing prime was the steak and ribs ol’ buddy was throwing down from the poo ton of money we paid him.

 

 

Seems like that entire team had offensive line problems beyond Turner. Suddenly he’s serviceable on the Steelers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I mean, did we?? Okung played in what, 7 games last year? Turner is still in the NFL and playing AVERAGE. 

FTFY


Not to mention he’s no longer on the contract that we gave him, he’s on a one year deal with the Steelers after an abysmal year with the Chargers.

If he would have had the same year with us that he had with the Chargers… let me just ask… have you seen the movie Old Yeller?

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

FTFY
Not to mention he’s no longer on the contract that we gave him, he’s on a one year deal with the Steelers after an abysmal year with the Chargers.

If he would have had the same year with us that he had with the Chargers… let me just ask… have you seen the movie Old Yeller?

The contract is a valid argument. But I can’t help but wonder how much worse Turner would really be than the trash they’ve rolled out at RG since they traded him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The contract is a valid argument. But I can’t help but wonder how much worse Turner would really be than the trash they’ve rolled out at RG since they traded him. 

Scott had a decent game last week. Unfortunately, the old ball coach trotted out John Miller this week and never gave Deonte Brown a chance.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...