Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you rather have Delhomme or Fox?


Lumps

Recommended Posts

Just curious. Those two are the most debated problem with the Panthers.

Personally, I say offer Fox his job and get rid of the QB. Give Fox with another QB and it might open up his perspective since he is so used of Delhomme he is narrowing his options, mostly because he has to. How likely would it be that something like this would happen?

Something is going to happen...however I don't think a new QB and a new HC is going to happen...I believe one of these guys is going to be back next year, but at the same time I believe one of them isn't which one do you think is more likley?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox by far. We just need another QB. Fox/Hurney have built one of the more talented teams in the league, they just lack the talent where they need it most, at QB. Jake's accuracy is just too far gone now. Whether they anticipated that or not is another story. But no doubt in my mind if we had a top 15 QB we'd be unstoppable. Hell if Jake still had an arm we probably be 7-3, 8-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox

Delhommes problems are beyond repair

At least we know Fox has it in him somewhere to recover and lead us back

At this point I would rather have a new coach. Im tired of doing well in soft schedule seasons and disappointing in tough seasons.

SOunds like the coach cant get his team prepared against hard teams/schedules.

and the 3-1 thing KILLS ME-- how about 4-0 ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...