Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It all comes back to Peppers


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Not saying we should have gone after him, but I can name one...Cutler. Cuz I still say if he were here he would be having a much better year.

No way Fox/Hurney would have brought in Cutler. Jake is therer guy and if they had the money they would have ignored Cutler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol not to be all ak here but i was called an idiot for saying we should let him walk

He could have got out of Charlotte by actually working with the team. We couldn't discuss a trade with anybody because he wouldn't sign the tender, and he wasn't signing. Without signing, he could have had his agent start talking deal with other teams but he didn't do that either. I think letting him walk could have set a precedent that could haunt us down the road in future negotiations with other players. That's my opinion. I can understand the stance that the cost to keep him was too high. That's why I ask for names. I didn't see a combination of players FOR OUR SYSTEM that was worth spending that money on. So why not hang onto the bird in the hand and see about getting a return on the investment next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Idiot--

Thats the amount of GOOD FA players we could have easily signed if we didnt give him that dumbass tag $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Just answer the question and quit trying to think you are somebody of consequence to me or anybody else.

Your claim was

Peppers price tag cost us 4 great players....

Not good, GREAT.

Since the cap hit is only this year, that would mean players that were available this year that we could have signed. Name them. Explain to us how they are fits for our system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Lucas

G. Hangartner

Frank Omaley (sp?)

Maybe these guys were not 'great players', but 2 were 'great backups' and Lucas was a good CB. I don't think Marshall has proven to be better than Lucas....he is a better nickel.

Well hells bells, with those three players right there we would be undefeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be mistaken with that extra money, who could we have gotten that would have made as much impact peppers? We lose him, we'd have to sign atleast one DE to replce him.

DUH!

Ken Lucas

Geoff Hargatner

Frank Omilyia

That trio right there is good for 6-7 extra wins a year.

I need to put in a disclaimer here. I agree that we should have let Pep walk although it would have set a really bad precedent with Jenkins walking the year before. To say that there were a bunch of stud FA out there that we could have gotten if we didn't re-sign him is ludicrous though.

The best we could have went after was Cutler and he was not a FA so we would have had to give up a poo ton for him like Chicago did. All that not taging Pep would have done would be to give us the money to absorb his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No DE should be making that much, its absolutely absurd, and the team will suffer because of it. We don't need a DE like Peppers who chooses when he wants to make an impact in the game. The panthers just need a consistent guy who can more often than not, hold down the outside, and use Brown for the pass rush.

The panthers can get this for a fraction of the cost of Peppers, and they already have one piece of the puzzle (Brown).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, XL is probably outside the top 100 NFL WR's. That is just not going to cut it.  He certainly could turn it around but our track record in this area is very well established. When our WR's bust, boy do they bust. XL looks exactly like so many of those cases.  XL has been the 9th most productive WR in that 2024 class and is likely to slip to 10th very soon as one of the guys who missed a large chunk of last season is about to pass him(Pearsall) in career production. That's not great for the 7th overall WR picked. It's a disappointment, without question. Even a the guy getting healthy scratches has still outperformed him so far.  And, for the record, it was a very, very productive WR class so far.
    • 4th read? On a playaction? Do you not watch the ALL 22? There were 4 receivers on that play. Only 2 went beyond 2 yards on a 10 yard crossing route in front of a single high safety. The TE stayed in to block before releasing on a drag route and was never a read. Coker was motioned to the right to pull a defender to the sideline. This was a clear flat route and hot if the defender came on a blitz. The RB stayed in to block on the right side. Coming out of the playaction Bryce spots the defender for a possible blitz and then goes to his primary receiver on his left. The only receiver on the left coming out of the playaction was TMac. He clearly follows TMac to the cross in front of the safety and looks off the safety to the left. This is not a read to XL. It's looking off the safety. He swings his vision back to his primary in TMac and throws the ball to the numbers (20) 10 yards over the head of the DB when TMac reaches the right hashes near the 30 yard line before TMac even makes a cut. Bryce was never leading or throwing to the receiver. He was throwing to a spot based on the movement of 2 defenders. It was up to TMac to make this play happen with perfect timing, release, sell and cut on his route. Give credit to the play design. The defense is playing that route as a sideline route and TMac makes it happen with his body position and control as he cuts/drifts 10 yards up field to the spot he knew it was going to before the play. If that were a 4th progression read out of a playaction, you'd see 4 hitch steps and the receiver would have been led to the sideline as TMac would have never known the ball was going to be thrown 10 yards over the DBs head on a 10 yard cross to the sideline. You can also tell this is the desgin as Bryce sets to the left out of the playaction with XL on his right before the cross. Then he takes 3 bounce steps to move with the pocket as XL is late to the cross. His first hitch step is to the right after TMac crosses, which is followed by an immediate throw before a cut is made by TMac. TMac was the only receiver to the left on Bryce's set, and he was one of 2 WRs to the right on Bryce's first and only hitch step. Give TMac and the play design a bulk of the credit. Bryce did well, but he didn't sell the playaction or a possible pass to XL very well. He did do very well at throwing to a predetermined spot on the field after TMac set up that crossing route perfectly with XL and Sanders both late on developing their routes. Did you catch all that on the play? For some reason, you think there were 4 progressions out of play action with the defense pressing, Bryce setting his hips to the left with all 3 receivers on the right side of what you think was his 4th option as the only receiver on the left at the snap, and only 1 hitch step to the right after TMac waits for XL to cross left. Why would you think a QB would set their hips to the left when their first 3 progressions are on the right side of the field?
    • Agreed, however there are many QBs that don't place it perfectly.  
×
×
  • Create New...