Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign former Colt Jordan Senn


Gscottnc5

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this is a repost... didnt see it on the first two pages

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2009/11/lb-johnson-joins-davis-on-ir-panthers-sign-former-colt-senn.html

Just two games after taking over for injured Thomas Davis as a starting outside linebacker, Landon Johnson has joined Davis on the injured reserve list and is out for the season.

Johnson suffered a knee injury in last Thursday's loss to Miami and was placed on I.R. today.

The Panthers signed Jordan Senn, a linebacker and special teamer, to replace Johnson on the roster.......(click link to read on)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LB was definitely one of our strong suits. We almost had too many LBs. Now it's all of a sudden an issue. When I first read about the LB injuries, I thought what difference does it make at this point, We're done. We'd get a higher 2nd round pick if we lose out. But we won't we'll we 3 or 4 games and end up with a mid 2nd round pick that won't get us squat!

But to the LB issue, the whole point of drafting Connor was he was suppose to be a stud. To me, he looks too small. But hasn't he cracked the lineup thus far. If he was so great that we had to draft him, instead of a safety (which we desperately needed) why haven't we used him over Anderson or Johnson? Is he only going to play MLB? Thus far he's only been out there in a pinch or to spell.

My question is, is he going to eventually replace Diggs at weak side? He can’t play strong side (I wouldn’t think). Surely they wouldn’t put him at MLB and move Beason?

What if we switch to a 3-4 next year? Where do you think each LB will play in that scheme? Who would go and who would stay? Your DEs become outside LBs in that scheme, so where will Beason, Davis, and Connor play? Can Connor fit that scheme?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...