Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albright: Panthers circling on Pickett


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I'm sorry, but I don't see where a first rounder was on the line, or where he tried to move up in the first. What we have is one quote that says he talked to the Rams.

It never made sense. Especially considering we dumped him after one season, and used the most expensive draft capital we've ever had to take a quarterback (that many thought was a huge risk) the following year.

Same guy almost dumped draft capital to trade back up in the 1st to nab Greg Little. Hurney was "that kind of guy" lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Verge said:

This was my last prediction 

xsPafp.jpg

I had 
Sewell > Horn > Waddle as our options 

vdRFu7.jpg

When Mac dropped I thought they would go him because of the hype he got from a few different people, that was incorrect. 

I knew I should have screenshotted your draft day thread. Shifty text, huh?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Verge said:

Same guy almost dumped draft capital to trade back up in the 1st to nab Greg Little. Hurney was "that kind of guy" lol

I'm still waiting for a source on that too.

You guys will be blaming Hurney a decade from now. Meanwhile we're in a death spiral as a franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Verge said:

Shifty text...?

You chanage your predictions often.

Here's what you said in your draft day thread

Quote

Do not be surprised if Carolina is not able to trade down out if 8 if Sewell is gone that they just stick at 8 and go with Waddle or Horn/Farley

It's okay. You throw a lot on the wall to see what sticks. I get it. Even on draft day there's a plethora of predictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Verge said:

The source is Marty Hurney 
 

 

LMFAO! You know general managers often laude second round picks as "first round talent".

This is so disengeous that I feel like I'm talking politics with Tim Pool.

Edited by Krovvy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

LMFAO! You know damn well that general managers often laude second round picks as "fire round talent".

This is so disengeous that I feel like I'm talking politics with Tim Pool.

So people like Igo, me, and Norris say it happened, and then Marty Hurney says it happened, but that is just fake? I guess I am not following the logic. He literally tells you he tried to move up for Greg Little. He would have drafted Greg Little at 16 if Burns was not there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Hey dude you do know we’re stuck with Fhule because of Hurney. Lol there some on here that just don’t get it. SMFH

Yeah, I forgot. It was Hurney who made the call to give Matt Rhule a 7 year contract, and also absolute player personel control. 

Some big brain takes at the huddle as usual.

Edited by Krovvy
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...