Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe I was wrong about KENNY PICKETT after reading these evaluations.


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Doesn't change  the risk factor was greatly diminished by where he was drafted..

That doesn't work when you draft that type of QB high..

And your idea of Out playing his draft status  is always being questioned if he is a franchise QB that can carry a team, no playoff success,  and being considered the least talented QB in that division...

He hasn’t had much to work with. See Matt Stafford… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Stafford was the number one pick. You have to build a team around QBs. The Raiders haven’t been the best ran team kind of like the Lions…

Stafford had the resume and talent to be a number 1 pick.. Pickett Nor Carr do.. And Yes Stafford didn't win which is another reason you shouldn't pick a sub par talent QB high because even the good ones need help.. it's just The Sub Par ones need alot  more of it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Post opinion pieces isn't changing the fact he has no playoff success and his talent only warranted a 2nd round pick... 

If we get Pickett in the 2nd round  cool. That means we got a for sure talent in the 1st and he was drafted to his talent and resume level..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Stafford had the resume and talent to be a number 1 pick.. Pickett Nor Carr do.. And Yes Stafford didn't win which is another reason you shouldn't pick a sub par talent QB high because even the good ones need help.. it's just The Sub Par ones need alot  more of it..

Stafford had the resume and talent to be number one yet STILL couldn’t win without talent around him. That’s my point. You need talent around your QB to win in the playoffs. Stafford got talent and look what happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Stafford had the resume and talent to be number one yet STILL couldn’t win without talent around him. That’s my point. You need talent around your QB to win in the playoffs. Stafford got talent and look what happened. 

Your point still doesn't justify wasting a high pick on a player with less talent, a lesser resume and more red flags!!

So just because every QB needs help (different amounts due to talent) we should draft a lesser talented one??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Post opinion pieces isn't changing the fact he has no playoff success and his talent only warranted a 2nd round pick... 

If we get Pickett in the 2nd round  cool. That means we got a for sure talent in the 1st and he was drafted to his talent and resume level..

It explains how good he had actually been for a lackluster team. If we get that kind of play out if our QB then it’s absolutely worth a 1st. Like I’ve been saying is 6 overdrafting him? Yes. QBs have and will continue to get overdrafted in this league and rightfully so. It’s the most important position by a long shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Your point still doesn't justify wasting a high pick on a player with less talent, a lesser resume and more red flags!!

So just because every QB needs help (different amounts due to talent) we should draft a lesser talented one??

I’m saying you can’t discredit all of Derek Carr’s stats/data because he hasn’t won in the playoffs with a bad team. A QB who people justified as the top in his class couldn’t either so it’s not really a knock on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It explains how good he had actually been for a lackluster team. If we get that kind of play out if our QB then it’s absolutely worth a 1st. Like I’ve been saying is 6 overdrafting him? Yes. QBs have and will continue to get overdrafted in this league and rightfully so. It’s the most important position by a long shot.

Cool I'm glad he has been so good that the actual team is always rumored to be in trade talks or looking at other QB's... Just like now when he is being talked about going to the Colts.. Its been that way almost every year for him.. So I'm glad this writer thinks so highly of Carr I wished his team did..

Still I wouldn't draft Derrick Carr in the top 10 either.. Because he is what he is a QB who needs a lot help to be successful...

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m saying you can’t discredit all of Derek Carr’s stats/data because he hasn’t won in the playoffs with a bad team. A QB who people justified as the top in his class couldn’t either so it’s not really a knock on him. 

We do the same to Tony Romo and Dak.. 

But again he was drafted in the 2nd round meaning his talent and resume at the time was seen that way.. 

When it doesn't go that way you over draft and put to much responsibilities (because where they were drafted) on players like Joey Harrington, Blain Gabbert and Locker and Christan Ponder...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Cool I'm glad he has been so good that the actual team is always rumored to be in trade talks or looking at other QB's... Just like now when he is being talked about going to the Colts.. Its been that way almost every year for him.. So I'm glad this writer thinks so highly of Carr I wished his team did..

It’s not just that one writer.

Colin Cowherd

https://heavy.com/sports/las-vegas-raiders/derek-carr-baker-mayfield-underrated/amp/


https://www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/nfl/2021/9/14/22673588/derek-carr-underrated-raiders-nfl-monday-night-football

-This one shows him on par with Brady and Ryan from the previous 3 years (when it was written 2021). With less talent around him. 

Yeah it shows you how dysfunctional his team is. Maybe they will do him a favor and trade him to a talent team like the Lions did with Stafford. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s not just that one writer.

Colin Cowherd

https://heavy.com/sports/las-vegas-raiders/derek-carr-baker-mayfield-underrated/amp/


https://www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/nfl/2021/9/14/22673588/derek-carr-underrated-raiders-nfl-monday-night-football

-This one shows him on par with Brady and Ryan from the previous 3 years (when it was written 2021). With less talent around him. 

Yeah it shows you how dysfunctional his team is. Maybe they will do him a favor and trade him to a talent team like the Lions did with Stafford. 

Post as many opinion pieces you want..

Facts are he was a 2nd round pick because his talent and resume deemed it that way..

I wouldn't have drafted him top 10 then and I wouldn't give up a top 10 pick for him now.  

And I feel even worse about Pickett who I don't think can carry Carr's Jock...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...