Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game Thread; Canes @ Lightning 3/29

Harbingers

By Harbingers,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Neal Perts said:

Last night the PP kill looks tired and off.  Raanta played well. We had guys waaay out of position in front of the net on these kills. That’s why we lost. You take away all three goals on the power-play we would have won 3-1 

Not to mention 2 of those PP were the result of horrible calls, especially the OT phantom hold on Staal. 

Edited by Anybodyhome
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neal Perts Apprentice

Neal Perts

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Not to mention 2 of those PP were the result of horrible calls, especially the OT phantom hold on Staal. 

Unfortunately it was a hold. Brief and Staal turned him.  However, playoff level OT hockey they usually let that Tic Tac stuff go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Neal Perts said:

Last night the PP kill looks tired and off.  Raanta played well. We had guys waaay out of position in front of the net on these kills. That’s why we lost. You take away all three goals on the power-play we would have won 3-1 

Your not wrong but Raanta hasn't been very successful. Maybe it's just how we are set up but we have been playing sloppy for an entire month now. We need to clean it up pronto because other teams are playing good hockey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TheCandyMan
      Canes vs Rags Round 2 Game 1 4pm

      By TheCandyMan · Posted

      Sounded like no on the podcast. Willis will be doing some stuff on WRAL. 
    • Hoenheim
      What Exactly Is Your Criteria for Bryce in 2024 to Have Faith In Him Moving Forward 2025+ ??

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      I kinda want to use this as a barometer of how people feel about Bryce as well. But the main purpose of this thread is mainly for those who have either mixed feelings or feel negative about Bryce. What exactly would it take for you to believe he's the franchise qb for the next decade? Or maybe simplifying that question,  what kind of stats would he need in need to really earn a top 10 qb deal/market rate for a 2nd contract with the panthers? Maybe that's a broader question because they could hold on to him for 4 or 5 years.  Maybe the key factor here is I don't believe Canales is tied to Bryce at all emotionally.  I don't truly know how much weight he has in the room to be able to move on from Bryce if he sucks again I guess, but I don't see him just sitting on his hands if we go 2 to 4 wins again. I'll try my hand at it here. I'd say something like 25 TDs 15 INTs or less, 3000+ passing yards, around 65%+ completions.  Wins and losses not be as relevant of a stat prediction for Bryce alone, but I would assume if we're at least somewhat competitive for the division that helps his case a lot.  If we have a winning record or a playoff appearance (or both), either of those may be more than enough regardless of Bryces performance because of how long we've been in a playoffs/winning season drought.  Looking at the opposite end of the spectrum,  I doubt this happens with all the changes BUT. If Bryce turns in another year with a 1:1 TD:INT ratio again or a negative ratio that's gonna spell trouble. Even if he has God awful stats he'd definitely still be on the team year 3 contractually, but I'd say that Canales wouldn't be beholden to keep starting him unless there was a directive from teppper to do so.  People keep saying the 2025 draft is a dead zone for QBs but Quin Ewers, Carson Beck, and Shedur Sanders are all of age, and any of them or someone else could blow up by the end of the next college season.  
    • frankw
      I hope you know what this means…

      By frankw · Posted

      Since you want to poo posts remotely critical of him months later why don't you return and own up to your thread?
×
×
  • Create New...