A bit of perspective (re Corral)

[LinvilleGorge]

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'll take Simms' evaluation over yours. Sorry.

You'll cherry pick the opinions that fit your narrative, even if they're in the significant minority.

[ForJimmy]

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You'll cherry pick the opinions that fit your narrative, even if they're in the significant minority.

https://www.cleveland.com/browns/2020/09/why-nfl-analyst-chris-simms-ranked-baker-mayfield-no-21-out-on-his-top-40-nfl-qbs-for-2020-and-where-hell-be-next-year.html?outputType=amp
 
Here is Simms talking about Baker. Constantly high on his arm and said he has the talent to be a top 10 or even 5 QB in this league. The arm talent is legit, decision making and personality are the negatives for him.

[top dawg]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

You'll cherry pick the opinions that fit your narrative, even if they're in the significant minority.

I don't here anyone talking about Baker Mayfield's arm talent. All you have to do is Google "Corral and arm talent" and likewise "Mayfield and arm talent" and see the results. Simple as that. 

[LinvilleGorge]

I like Corral. He was my second favorite QB in the draft. But his arm strength isn't special. His quickness of release is. But suggesting he has a better arm than Mayfield is just not accurate. He has a quicker release but he can't throw with the velocity or distance that Mayfield can. Hell, in terms of pure arm strength he probably had the 4th best arm in this weak QB draft class.

[LinvilleGorge]

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I don't here anyone talking about Baker Mayfield's arm talent. All you have to do is Google "Corral and arm talent" and likewise "Mayfield and arm talent" and see the results. Simple as that. 

You mean there's more recent discussion of the arm talent of a recently drafted QB than a QB drafted four years ago? Wow! What other ground breaking news do you have for me? Do you have even a rudimentary understanding of how internet search results work?

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I like Corral. He was my second favorite QB in the draft. But his arm strength isn't special. His quickness of release is. But suggesting he has a better arm than Mayfield is just not accurate. He has a quicker release but he can't throw with the velocity or distance that Mayfield can. Hell, in terms of pure arm strength he probably had the 4th best arm in this weak QB draft class.

Arm strength and talent aren't exactly the same thing, but whatever. Baker isn't even as strong as Corral, but you keep believing yourself. When Baker throws the ball 77 yards, then talk to me.

[LinvilleGorge]

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Arm strength and talent aren't exactly the same thing, but whatever. Baker isn't even as strong as Corral, but you keep believing yourself. When Baker throws the ball 77 yards, then talk to me.

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You mean there's more recent discussion of the arm talent of a recently drafted QB than a QB drafted four years ago? Wow! What other ground breaking news do you have for me? Do you have even a rudimentary understanding of how internet search results work?

Oh, so now you're an expert on Google search results? Now show me where search queries are based on recency bias? I'm waiting. 

 

[LinvilleGorge]

11 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Oh, so now you're an expert on Google search results? Now show me where search queries are based on recency bias? I'm waiting. 

 

Are you serious?

If you had any clue you'd realize what a dumb road your going down right now. If you actually care, just Google "Google Freshness".

 

[t96]

Why is a mod perpetuating a silly back and forth?

[top dawg]

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Are you serious?

If you had any clue you'd realize what a dumb road your going down right now. If you actually care, just Google "Google Freshness".

 

You do realize that is mainly related to news results? Some content is Evergreen. Like draft profiles and scouting reports and such are likely not going to disappear for awhile. 

Bottom line: you can generally find any information you're looking for with the "right" search terms.

[LinvilleGorge]

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You do realize that is mainly related to news results? Some content is Evergreen. Like draft profiles and scouting reports and such are likely not going to disappear for awhile. 

Bottom line: you can generally find any information you're looking for with the "right" search terms.

Got it. You're willing to remain willfully ignorant to adhere to your biases. You named your search terms. Those were certainly not the "right" terms to avoid the inherent recency biases in the Google algorithm that you mocked even existed.

Just stop, man. You're making an ass of yourself.

 

 

 

[top dawg]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Got it. You're willing to remain willfully ignorant to adhere to your biases. You named your search terms. Those were certainly not the "right" terms to avoid the inherent recency biases in the Google algorithm that you mocked even existed.

Just stop, man. You're making an ass of yourself.

 

 

 

Google algorithms change ALL the time. For you to pretend that you can't find information on Mayfield's arm talent is inaccurate, and frankly weak as hell. But, it hardly matters, your opinion is just that, regardless of how you want to make it some fact supported by most NFL experts. Basically, you're full of it, and got the nerve to call me an ass? Just say "We agree to disagree."

Find your supportive links that show the world where Mayfield's arm talent is "significantly better" than Corral's and I'll be happy to take you seriously. Until then, your opinion is hollow.

[LinvilleGorge]

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Google algorithms change ALL the time. For you to pretend that you can't find information on Mayfield's arm talent is inaccurate, and frankly weak as hell. But, it hardly matters, your opinion is just that, regardless of how you want to make it some fact supported by most NFL experts. Basically, you're full of it, and got the nerve to call me an ass? Just say "We agree to disagree."

Find your supportive links that show the world where Mayfield's arm talent is "significantly better" than Corral's and I'll be happy to take you seriously. Until then, your opinion is hollow.

It was YOUR ARGUMENT. You set the terms. Your terms were trash. You mocked the existence of recency bias on search algorithms which is fuging absurd. Now you're continuing to completely talk out of your ass.

This is why no one on this site takes your and your opinions seriously. You don't even seemingly take yourself seriously.