Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carryovers from the current administration


faultlessjoint

Recommended Posts

By administration I mean GM, coaching staff, and QB.

Every week I have been very optimistic about turning it around, and hesitant to throw anyone under the bus. But it's clear to me now, that Fox, Davidson, and Delhomme must go.

However, I would be open to keeping Hurney and Meeks. I'm not suggesting this is what SHOULD be done, but rather I wouldn't be pissed if it happened. Defense hasn't been the best, but it's been much better than I expected and good enough to support our talented offense. Jury's still out on Meeks IMO.

I also think Hurney has done a good job, except with Delhomme extension. But I forgive him for that, as I'm sure Fox had heavy influence that Delhomme was "his man". If you look around our starting lineup we have more top notch players than almost any team in the league. Smith, Williams, Gross, Beason, Davis, and Peppers are all all-pro caliber players at their positions. And Stewart and Otah are showing great promise of making it to that level.

I don't know as much about the individual position coaches as some other people on this board. Are any of them worth keeping around and/or promoting?

Oh yeah, almost forgot, no way in hell we should let anyone outbid us for Danny Crossman. He deserves the big bucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fox/hurney is a package deal unless hurney pulls the plug on fox, himself (which i don't see that happening).

i don't want a HC/GM. i want those two jobs separate.

i don't want the defense to go through learning another defensive scheme. i think this can be good if we have all the players healthy and can do the same aggressive and creative things we did in several games this year. i think it was pretty clear that meeks was working out of his comfort zone by blitzing but he did a good job with it. the defense that we saw the first half against the cowboys and against the cardinals...i liked a lot. i would keep the defensive staff the same.

this would mean having to go with someone that wasn't a defensive minded coach who could let meeks run the show on defense, just tell him to make it more aggressive and creative.

i don't want someone who is considered defensive minded or offensive minded. i want a manager/leader. i want someone who picks the best coordinators and lets them do their job. tell them where you want to go and what you want to look like and trust that they can get you there.

only changes (other than HC) i see being really necessary is on offense and special teams. i like jim skipper and dave magazu and think they do a good job so i'd want to keep them but everyone else could go.

however, i wouldn't be opposed to a new HC coming in and cleaning house if they felt it necessary. i just think that those house cleanings are called for in teams that need to be completely rebuilt. that's not the panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BradThomas

I could see them keeping Rich Williamson (WR coach), Skipper and Magazu. The rest is easily replaced.

We still don't know if the Richardsons told Hurney to sign Delhomme or not. It's quite plausible that they told him to get a deal done. That would have left it out of his hands.

I'm not keen on the trade that netted Brown for a future first at the moment. Is he a decent player? I think so. Worth of multiple draft picks? Not right now. Still too early to tell.

There are a lot of pieces here that would be attractive to a new coach and coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see them keeping Rich Williamson (WR coach), Skipper and Magazu. The rest is easily replaced.

We still don't know if the Richardsons told Hurney to sign Delhomme or not. It's quite plausible that they told him to get a deal done. That would have left it out of his hands.

I'm not keen on the trade that netted Brown for a future first at the moment. Is he a decent player? I think so. Worth of multiple draft picks? Not right now. Still too early to tell.

There are a lot of pieces here that would be attractive to a new coach and coaching staff.

Why should Williamson stay ?

He doesn't have a stellar record in WR development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as the coordinators, they're probably all gone because if a new coach came in he would likely want to install his own type of offense and defense.

With that said, he could keep Meeks if he's a cover 2 guy. If he likes to air it out and ignore the running game, then Davidson could stay as well. ;)

As far as the assistants, a lot of them might hang around, but they would have to interview for the jobs just like everyone else.

This all begs the question, what happens to Danny Crossman? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm okay with Hurney staying if it is in the role of VP of Contracts and Salary Cap (or something like that). A GM is suppose to be the person who in charge of the coaches and players, not in partnership with them. Hurney's biggest fault isn't in his decisions or drafts or things to that nature. It has been his inability to supervise Fox and make the tough calls when need be. If anything, Hurney should be fired for allowing himself to be "packaged" with Fox.

As for the coordiantors, position coaches, scouting departments and even players, a new GM and coach is going to mean changes. Depending on who those two people are will determine the outcome of how much turnover we see but no matter what there will be some turnover that we as fans won't like right off the bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jerry Richardson doesn't want to give full control.

I'm a believer that a new coach generally wants to pick his own staff. If there are holdovers, it'll only be because he wants them.

Yea that would seem the case but alot of the time Coaches keep holdovers. Just like Jon Fox did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BradThomas

Williamson was responsible for the development of Muhammad, Ismail, Smith and Jeffers while with the Panthers. IMO his cupboard has been bare the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...