Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fit and Morgan: SHOULD they stay?


CanadianCat
 Share

Should Fitterer be tired to Rhue?  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Fitterer be tired to Rhue?

    • Fire them all
      24
    • Fitterer gets a chance to hire his HC
      85


Recommended Posts

right now Im 50/50 on this......I did like how both drafts went, even though each was totally different. 

His first FA was hella bad and still is. Much better 2nd FA haul after morgan came abroad. 

One deal, maybe the biggest is who he'd have in mind.......that would be very telling.

It does seem fair to give him a chance to hire "his" guy, but Im sooo pissed right now fair is not on my mind.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

That's just the nature of the business.  There are plenty of inner circles where coaches replace others who are friends.  You think Dan Morgan would turn down the GM job if we fired Fitt because they are friends?  What would Morgan's career path be?  I guess he would just have to wait for another franchise to offer him a promotion? 

Fitt will get a position on another team but there are only 32 NFL GM jobs available in the league and if he was offered one, especially with a team he played for, I doubt he would turn it down.  It's what we should have down with Beane...

I think you're letting what happened with Beane cloud your judgment a little. That, or Morgan fanhood.

Morgan doesn't have the scouting experience Fitterer has, nor the interview experience for that matter. He's only had one interview that I know of. That was with the Steelers, who basically interviewed everybody.

At this point, he's not really on anyone's "hot list" and I don't expect this season will help his cause much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it helps that Bryce and Tmac worked out a bit this off-season before the draft and are familiar with each other's game from way back.  Sure Bryce put in a good word for him to the coaching crew ahead of time That california connection goin' work, I hope
    • Sign but make it mostly incentive driven contract
    • My biggest problem is I think the players he likes don't really work in the modern NFL.  You mentioned the wr room being a lot better, is it?  It has the potential to be.   Last year when we traded up to get Legette, they said they traded up to take him specifically because he was a true X receiver.   Now this year they take TMac because they say he is and that XL was out of posisition last year.  Im not sold on Tmac yet just like I wasn't sold on XL last year.  If TMac isn't a lot better than last XL was last season then that's back to back first rounders in one position that would still need a huge amount of work.  Hopefully Tmac is what everyone seems to think he will be, I'm just not so sure, but them declaring XL was a true X receiver after the draft last year and what they're saying now should at least give you pause about their receivers evaluation because it means they definitely made a mistake one way or another.
×
×
  • Create New...