Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All 22 Breakdown Wk 4: Off vs Arizona Def


ChuckWag78
 Share

Recommended Posts

Honestly worst thing baker did in that game was sail some easy passes. Some plays looked like miscommunication with him and the receiver. Or the receiver not taking an angle on a route that he should have. (He called it playing like a robot instead of a football player). 
 

watching this Thursday night game it seems a lot offenses are playing like trash this year. No surprise the ones playing the best offense are the most successful right now. And there’s only a few. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dynomite said:

Honestly worst thing baker did in that game was sail some easy passes. Some plays looked like miscommunication with him and the receiver. Or the receiver not taking an angle on a route that he should have. (He called it playing like a robot instead of a football player). 
 

watching this Thursday night game it seems a lot offenses are playing like trash this year. No surprise the ones playing the best offense are the most successful right now. And there’s only a few. 

Discounting deflections and drops Mayfield is 80% accuracy against Cardinals. 5 true misses include the passes you mention, so it wasn't as bad as I thought watching live.  

If you had told me last year Mayfield goes to Panthers and plays bad, I'd have believed it, because Rhule and because who knows what Mayfield shows up post injury.

I don't know if I would also have believed both Matt Ryan and Russel Wilson would look worse on (what were)  better teams. 

Jacoby Brissett is the only QB on a new squad playing much better than I'd thought, and I think he's coming back to earth, and benefited from an easy schedule. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

And defensive film study 

Definitely. 

One dropped INT and one voided because of that terrible PI, and Brissett's game against the Panthers looks way worse, and Carolina definitely wins that one.

That's the only hope against Jimmy G this weekend and the niners: making 9ers pay with turnover worthy plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take away was that Baker played  better than my impression watching the game live.  Which just means he wasn't horrible, there was competent enough QB play to give the Panthers a chance.   CMC single handedly kept the game close.  Moton was awful, he's clearly having issues.  Ekwonu is inconsistent.  Thomas can't be left 1 on 1 on a DE, bad things happen.  The line often looked like it just wasn't in sync.  Nobody was really to blame by themselves, but everyone was partly to blame.  The only player to really elevate the offense was CMC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...