Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Rhule worse than Seifert?


Who was worse  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. .

    • George Seifert
      11
    • Matt Rhule
      58


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Why did you come at me stating you had stats to prove that 2010 and 2022 were worse than 2001? When now your comment is basicaly is just conjecture? I dont understand the premise of doing that.....

I came at you because you will not admit that Rhules tenure was worse than any other HC we have had. Admit that and we good. Fair? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

I came at you because you will not admit that Rhules tenure was worse than any other HC we have had. Admit that and we good. Fair? 

I dont why my opinion matters so much to you. Ive always thought you and I have gotten along well here on the huddle, but it appears I have triggered somehow and I do apologize. I try to use data as much as possibe for many of my conversations here. Seifert is someone not only statisitcally was bad here, but ruined my childhood fandom as well.  So there is a mix here.

Edited by TheCasillas
so many typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I dont why my opinion matters so much to you. Ive always thought you and I have gotten along well here on the huddle, but it appears I have triggered somehow and I do apologize. I try to use data as much as possibe for many of my conversations here. Seifert is someone not only statisitcally was bad here, but ruined my childhood fandom as well.  So there is a mix here.

It's not that it matters but why back Rhule? Every sign says he is the worst HC ever. I get 2001 we were mostly young but hell we have less time on this earth now. We need a good coach even more now and maybe one SB in our lifetime. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

It's not that it matters but why back Rhule? Every sign says he is the worst HC ever. I get 2001 we were mostly young but hell we have less time on this earth now. We need a good coach even more now and maybe one SB in our lifetime. 🤷‍♂️

The way you feel about Rhule, is the way I feel about Seifert. They both sucked as Panthers HC. They both made IDENTICAL mistakes. I am ready to move on from Rhule, as I have shared for the last couple of months. 

I am ready for a good coach. I hope Tepper hires some pros to come help find our next HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The way you feel about Rhule, is the way I feel about Seifert. They both sucked as Panthers HC. They both made IDENTICAL mistakes. I am ready to move on from Rhule, as I have shared for the last couple of months. 

I am ready for a good coach. I hope Tepper hires some pros to come help find our next HC.

Well that's something we can both agree on. 🍻

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...