Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucs defensive scheme? Anybody notice if they were running Zone or Man more?


AlphabetsEnd
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just rewatched the game and the Bucs are playing Zone, which is why we see open receivers, and why poor handoffs leave DJ and Tommy Tremble are so open on their touchdowns. 

This is deflating as the WRs have shown little ability to get open against man, and this looks like bad D from the Bucs and if teams play Man coverage, we're back to the problem we've had all season. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No team runs exclusively man… they’d get annihilated if they did.

In reality, teams are in man coverage 30% of the time this year which means the remaining 70% of the time they are in zone.

Wilks just had a good game plan and they executed.

I’d also argue that Walker looks more comfortable in the pocket than any QB that is on the roster, so having someone that is willing to stand back there and scan the field is a big plus as well. The Panthers opened it up a bit today and Walker delivered, mind you he’s never had issues moving the ball between the 20’s… it’s always been about his turnovers and red zone production.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

No team runs exclusively man… they’d get annihilated if they did.

In reality, teams are in man coverage 30% of the time this year which means the remaining 70% of the time they are in zone.

Wilks just had a good game plan and they executed.

I’d also argue that Walker looks more comfortable in the pocket than any QB that is on the roster, so having someone that is willing to stand back there and scan the field is a big plus as well. The Panthers opened it up a bit today and Walker delivered, mind you he’s never had issues moving the ball between the 20’s… it’s always been about his turnovers and red zone production.

Different teams play more or less zone. The Saints played Man on a much higher rate against this offense earlier this season, and the receivers did not separate. 

I just watched the game, and the Bucs were in Zone a lot, and on most passing plays (so far as I could tell without All22) On both of the TD passes, which accounted for the bulk of pass production and both scores they are clearly in Zone. PJ reads this and is looking for DJ on the first play, and Tremble on the second. That's why they worked, correct play/read vs scheme, and it helped that the Bucs secondary played poorly. 

I would agree that PJ looks comfortable in this offense (even while it's a bad scheme) but I did not find him scanning the field, rather much more prone to locking onto reads, especially looking for Moore. He is seems well suited to the short pass game, but I think when we see him against a more functional defense, not relying on zone with third stringers, we might see the old PJ return. 

I did not see them opening up the offense much this week. I saw West Coast vs Zone.  If you remove the two TDs against zone, there was not much actual down field passing. He played the short game well, but I'm dubious of what he'll do against a better secondary. 

The run game moved the sticks, and opened up the passing game as well. Feel free to rewatch and see what you see! 

 

Edited by AlphabetsEnd
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

% Of Snaps Spent in Man Coverage

Week 1 - Browns - 17.1%

Week 2 - Giants - 35.0%

Week 3 - Saints - 48.3%

Week 4 - Cardinals - 10%

Week 5 - 49ers - 19.2%

Week 6 - Rams - 4.3%

Our only other win came against the team that spent nearly half their coverage snaps in man. I’d argue that this is more of an indicator of a shitty scheme and receivers not cutting or carrying their routes properly into and out of zones.

I’d also add that sometimes we place too much value on the numbers, sometimes it comes down to winning the battles up front. Both our defensive line and offensive line were better than the Bucs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I think the receivers sometimes get to much heat this year.  I just don't think our passers have been good enough.  Take the TD pass to DJ for example.  DJ wasn't open by much, but Walker took a chance and made a great throw, and DJ caught it.  I am not sure Baker would have even attempted that throw.

I feel like I can say with confidence that Baker would not have attempted that pass, sometimes you got to throw a guy open and Baker never showed the willingness to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

 

Our only other win came against the team that spent nearly half their coverage snaps in man. I’d argue that this is more of an indicator of a shitty scheme and receivers not cutting or carrying their routes properly into and out of zones.

I’d also add that sometimes we place too much value on the numbers, sometimes it comes down to winning the battles up front. Both our defensive line and offensive line were better than the Bucs.

All good points. I would agree on scheme and route running. 

I would also seriously agree on putting too much value on numbers - which is why I've resorted to watching so much film and putting plays in context, as the numbers just haven't seemed to add up this season (or really ever). 

I wasn't able to do a close review of the trenches, but I didn't see anything to contradict that. Most of the big gains from the Bucs offense were in passing and Brady never seemed comfortable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Take the TD pass to DJ for example.  DJ wasn't open by much, but Walker took a chance and made a great throw, and DJ caught it.  I am not sure Baker would have even attempted that throw.

I'd suggest rewatching it (as I will again when the ALL22 is available). DJ was very open, especially by this season's standards. It was a good throw by PJ for sure (but a better catch by DJ), and PJ reads the zone right away right away and locks on DJ. Same with Tremble's TD. He must have seen something in the presnap reads he liked. 

I'm not trying to debate Mayfield at the moment, but he has attempted far riskier throws throughout his career and while in Carolina.

The difference today was DJ actually has better separation because the zone recovery was slow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...