Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Board & Pick 39: Offensive Skill Player Rankings


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Growl said:

honestly thinking real hard about a CB in the 2nd, value is better and is a huge position of need. I never wanna see cj henderson again. 
 

if one of the hard coded 1st round receivers is there (totally plausible) then I’d do that. 

With all this talk of the "sexy" pick of a WR at 39 or trading for Nuke finally someone realized the corners need help too. It's Horn pretty much by himself.  Donte Jackson might not be healthy by start of season or unfortunately ever be the same player.  CJ is a 4th at best and special teamer.  SO put away the dreams of fixing the offense in one off-season and let's all remember that we have a 3-4 transition to work through and our oline depth neeeds help too. Cade Mays seems like a gamer but after that what we got?  The Arbys package on the oline doesn't need to go away completely so we need more beef. 

I seen someone else bring this up. But I say we trade tow from 39 and gain another 3rd. From 45 to 65 is prime diamond in the rough territory.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I also think CB is a bigger need than we all seem to realize (because we are not talking about it). 

The wide receiver room is better than the cornerback room.  We have enough to field a team. I don't know if that's true at corner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, RJK said:

I just took a look at the WR class last night and the majority of them are 5’10 or smaller and sub 180 lbs. lots of slot guys but no #1 outside a few guys that will be gone by 39 

I wonder if we'll be aggressive and trade back into the 1st round for a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • too old, too expensive and would take draft capital
    • I saw the list, agree Minshew would be on the list of possible guys as well as the rest of the list.  Mac Jones would probably be the highest possible target though that would require a trade. All that said, heres a darkhorse that I wouldnt be surprised...Carson Wentz.  I know he looked rough his last time out, however he was clearly pretty dangerously injured and kept playing through it.  When he was healthy in Minnesota he looked pretty fricken good.  Last full season he started he threw for 3500, 27td, 7 INT.  He did start the next season for a washington team running a scheme that does not fit him.  I think the things that Canales is looking for his QB to do, that Wentz does well.   Wentz however with his age would not be any kind of long term solution, a decent backup but more like actual competition would be needed to go into the season.  
    • This reads as someone trying to suggest changes while treading lightly so Daddy Tepper doesn’t come down too hard on them.  Because flatly, the problem is Bryce.  I don’t think Canales is a perfect coach, but you can see the limitations in what can be called, what is called, and the amount of times Bryce fugs up plays all by himself.  Someone brought up the bootlegs being useless because there is always a free defender rushing - think about how different that play looks with a 6’2”+ QB with a strong arm and mobility.  I can’t count the number of times Bryce has thrown and missed bc he can’t see, it gets deflected, he chucks it away, or his patented run and fumble just on bootlegs and roll outs.  By percentage of those plays per player I have ever watched, Bryce has more negative plays WITHOUT A fuging DOUBT than anyone I have ever watched before.  Like an uncanny ability to fug up the simplest of things.  I have never seen anything like it.  And then, as I mentioned in the other thread, when you string those seemingly one-off plays together, and those stack over the course of a game, poo looks really disjointed.  It is Bryce.  Enough of this nebulous ass “something’s afoot!” bullshit.
×
×
  • Create New...