Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen, Tate leaving Notre Dame for NFL draft

rey2009

By rey2009,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

clausen will probably be the first QB taken and would require the world to draft.

tate as it stands now is a second round player that will climb a little depending on his combine. Any deal to grab clausen would almost certainly require the 2010 2nd rounder.

it's just no feasible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

Can someone explain to me the fascination with Clausen? I can think of at least 4 other QBs in this draft I'd rather have, and that's assuming Mallet isn't coming out.

excelled in a pro style offense, has all the tools in the world, might be a bit of a cade mccown

also get this mallet poo out of here right now. not only is he getting the petrino treatment (he was poo with a stacked cast in michigan) but he's dumb as a brick and sounds like an extra from 8 mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

just smells like a brady quinn clone to me...but what the *** do I know? :lol: not much

nah, quinn was always overblown by the national media because of where he played and the fact he looks like me. every could see he was a poor man's pennington.

it should be obvious what nfl teams though about him. he would have fallen to the second if the browns hadn't needlessly traded up for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Panthers Preseason

      By frankw · Posted

      Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • CRA
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By CRA · Posted

      A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • WUnderhill
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...